Question

A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...

A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 18 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1250 feet with a standard deviation of 31 feet. A sample of 11 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1230 feet with a standard deviation of 33 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ 1 be the true mean range of the manufacturer's cordless telephone and μ 2   be the true mean range of the competitor's cordless telephone. Use a significance level of  α=0.05 for the test. Assume that the population variances are equal and that the two populations are normally distributed.

Step 3 of 4 :

Determine the decision rule for rejecting the null hypothesis H 0  H0 . Round your answer to three decimal places.

Homework Answers

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 18 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1230 feet with a standard deviation of 37 feet. A sample of 13 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1190 feet with a standard deviation of 39 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ 1 be the true...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 21 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1140 feet with a standard deviation of 43 feet. A sample of 11 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1110 feet with a standard deviation of 38 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1 be the true mean...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 6 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1300 feet with a standard deviation of 20 feet. A sample of 12 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1290 feet with a standard deviation of 42 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1 be the true mean...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 11 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1070 feet with a standard deviation of 25 feet. A sample of 17 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1040 feet with a standard deviation of 22 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1 be the true mean...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 17 17 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1100 1100 feet with a standard deviation of 33 33 feet. A sample of 10 10 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1090 1090 feet with a standard deviation of 42 42 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim?...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 11 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1240 feet with a standard deviation of 24 feet. A sample of 18 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1230 feet with a standard deviation of 28 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let ?1 be the true mean...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 11 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1050 feet with a standard deviation of 40 feet. A sample of 18 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1030 feet with a standard deviation of 25 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let µ1 be the true mean...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 12 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1150 feet with a standard deviation of 27 feet. A sample of 7 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1100 feet with a standard deviation of 23 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1μ1 be the true mean...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 1919 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 11101110 feet with a standard deviation of 2222 feet. A sample of 1111 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 10601060 feet with a standard deviation of 2323 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1μ1 be the true mean...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 1111 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 13901390 feet with a standard deviation of 3333 feet. A sample of 2020 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 13601360 feet with a standard deviation of 3030 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1μ1 be the true mean...