Question

A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...

A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 18 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1230 feet with a standard deviation of 37 feet. A sample of 13 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1190 feet with a standard deviation of 39 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ 1 be the true mean range of the manufacturer's cordless telephone and μ 2 be the true mean range of the competitor's cordless telephone. Use a significance level of α=0.1 for the test. Assume that the population variances are equal and that the two populations are normally distributed.

Step 2 of 4 : Compute the value of the t test statistic. Round your answer to three decimal places.

PLEASE SHOW WORK!!!

Homework Answers

Answer #1

To Test :-

H0 :-  

H1 :-  

Test Statistic :-




t = 2.9042


Test Criteria :-
Reject null hypothesis if


Result :- Reject Null Hypothesis


Decision based on P value
P - value = P ( t > 2.9042 ) = 0.0035
Reject null hypothesis if P value < level of significance
P - value = 0.0035 < 0.1 ,hence we reject null hypothesis
Conclusion :- Reject null hypothesis


There is sufficient evidence to support the claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor at 10% level of significance.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 18 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1250 feet with a standard deviation of 31 feet. A sample of 11 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1230 feet with a standard deviation of 33 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ 1 be the true...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 21 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1140 feet with a standard deviation of 43 feet. A sample of 11 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1110 feet with a standard deviation of 38 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1 be the true mean...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 6 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1300 feet with a standard deviation of 20 feet. A sample of 12 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1290 feet with a standard deviation of 42 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1 be the true mean...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 18 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1270 feet with a standard deviation of 29 feet. A sample of 13 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1250 feet with a standard deviation of 30 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1 μ 1 be the...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 11 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1070 feet with a standard deviation of 25 feet. A sample of 17 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1040 feet with a standard deviation of 22 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1 be the true mean...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 17 17 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1100 1100 feet with a standard deviation of 33 33 feet. A sample of 10 10 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1090 1090 feet with a standard deviation of 42 42 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim?...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 11 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1240 feet with a standard deviation of 24 feet. A sample of 18 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1230 feet with a standard deviation of 28 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let ?1 be the true mean...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 8 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1300 feet with a standard deviation of 43 feet. A sample of 14 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1280 feet with a standard deviation of 36 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1μ1 be the true mean...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 11 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1050 feet with a standard deviation of 40 feet. A sample of 18 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1030 feet with a standard deviation of 25 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let µ1 be the true mean...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 12 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1150 feet with a standard deviation of 27 feet. A sample of 7 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1100 feet with a standard deviation of 23 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1μ1 be the true mean...