Question

Consider a game where both players have a dominant strategy. In this type of game ___...

Consider a game where both players have a dominant strategy. In this type of game ___

a.strategic interactions play no role

b.the optimal decision for both players does not depend on the behavior of the other player

c.each player is expected to play her dominant strategy irrespective of the strategy selected by the other player

d.all of the above are correct

e.none of the above are correct

Homework Answers

Answer #1

As we know that, Dominant strategies are considered as better than other strategies, no matter what other players might do.  Dominant strategy occurs when one strategy is better than another strategy for one player, no matter how that player's opponents may play.

There are two kinds of strategic dominance: A strictly dominant strategy is that strategy that always provides greater utility to a the player, no matter what the other player’s strategy is. A weakly dominant strategy is that strategy that provides at least the same utility for all the other player’s strategies, and strictly greater for some strategy.

The correct option is (c).

c.each player is expected to play her dominant strategy irrespective of the strategy selected by the other player.

Hope you got the answer.

Kindly comment for further explanation

Thanks ?

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Consider the following two-person zero-sum game. Assume the two players have the same two strategy options....
Consider the following two-person zero-sum game. Assume the two players have the same two strategy options. The payoff table shows the gains for Player A. Player B Player A strategy b1 strategy b2 strategy a1 3 9 Strategy a2 6 2 Determine the optimal strategy for each player. What is the value of the game?
In a dominant strategy equilibrium a player uses a strategy that maximizes his utility no matter...
In a dominant strategy equilibrium a player uses a strategy that maximizes his utility no matter what strategies other players use.  True or false? In a nash equilibrium a player uses the strategy that maximizes his utility no matter what strategies other players uses. True or false? Consider a game where there is a dominant strategy equilibrium. You would then argue that, in equilibrium a-Each player gets the highest utility he can possibly get b-Total surplus is not necessarily maximized c-Total...
Consider the following simultaneous move game If both players choose strategy A, player 1 earns $526...
Consider the following simultaneous move game If both players choose strategy A, player 1 earns $526 and player 2 earns $526. If both players choose strategy B, then player 1 earns $746 and player 2 earns $406. If player 1 chooses strategy B and player 2 chooses strategy A, then player 1 earns $307 and player 2 earns $336. If player 1 chooses strategy A and player 2 chooses strategy B, then player 1 earns $966 and player 2 earns...
Consider the following two-person zero-sum game. Assume the two players have the same three strategy options....
Consider the following two-person zero-sum game. Assume the two players have the same three strategy options. The payoff table below shows the gains for Player A. Player B Player A Strategy b1 Strategy b2 Strategy b3 Strategy  a1   3 2 ?4 Strategy  a2 ?1 0   2 Strategy  a3   4 5 ?3 Is there an optimal pure strategy for this game? If so, what is it? If not, can the mixed-strategy probabilities be found algebraically? What is the value of the game?
Game Theory: John and Dave are playing a game where they only have two strategies, either...
Game Theory: John and Dave are playing a game where they only have two strategies, either to move left or move right. The payoffs from this game are the points that each player will earn given the strategies that each play. The higher the points, the higher the payoffs each player will receive. The normal form representation of the game is presented below.                                                    DAVE                         Left                                                  Right Left 1,1 0,3 Right 3,0 2,2 John's name label should be on...
A game has two players. Each player has two possible strategies. One strategy is Cooperate, the...
A game has two players. Each player has two possible strategies. One strategy is Cooperate, the other is Defect. Each player writes on a piece of paper either a C for cooperate or a D for defect. If both players write C, they each get a payoff of $100. If both players write D, they each get a payoff of 0. If one player writes C and the other player writes D, the cooperating player gets a payoff of S...
Answer the following questions about oligopolistic markets for a simultaneous game in which Microsoft and Apple...
Answer the following questions about oligopolistic markets for a simultaneous game in which Microsoft and Apple decide whether to advertise or not. Players: Apple and Microsoft (MS) Strategies: Advertise (A) or No-Ads (NA) Payoffs: If both choose to A, Apple gets $8 billion revenue and MS gets $16 billion revenue; If Apple choose A and MS choose NA, Apple gets $15 billion and MS gets $12 billion; If Apple choose NA and MS choose A, Apple gets $10 billion and...
Mixed Strategies Consider the following game between two players Bad-Boy and Good-Girl. Bad-Boy can either behave...
Mixed Strategies Consider the following game between two players Bad-Boy and Good-Girl. Bad-Boy can either behave or misbehave whereas Good-Girl can either punish or reward. Below payoff matrix shows the game as pure strategies. Good Girl Reward Punish Bad Boy Behave 5, 5 -5,-5 Misbehave 10,-10 -10,-5 Question 41 (1 point) What is the Nash equilibrium of the game in pure strategies? Question 41 options: Behave-Reward Behave-Punish Misbehave-Punish There is no Nash equilibrium in pure strategies. Question 42 (1 point)...
Case study 1.3: Equal prize money in tennis A British cabinet minister has now stepped into...
Case study 1.3: Equal prize money in tennis A British cabinet minister has now stepped into the debate regarding equal prize money at Wimbledon, the British Open tennis championships. Patricia Hewitt (no relation to the men’s winner), the Trade and Industry Secretary, announced that it is ‘simply wrong’ that the winner of the men’s singles should collect £525,000, while the women’s winner should receive only £486,000, when they had both worked equally hard. The debate regarding prize money is not...
In 100 words state if you agree or disagree with the summary given for the Scenario....
In 100 words state if you agree or disagree with the summary given for the Scenario. PLEASE reframe from using Overuse of ambiguous terms such as it, this, and they should not be used. Scenario Part 1: Workplace unrest Environment: You are the Director of a team of employees that do various PA duties. The team consists of 15 employees that are assigned duties in different building locations and collocated with other PA personnel from other directorates in a matrix...