Question

In a dominant strategy equilibrium a player uses a strategy that maximizes his utility no matter...

  1. In a dominant strategy equilibrium a player uses a strategy that maximizes his utility no matter what strategies other players use.  True or false?
  2. In a nash equilibrium a player uses the strategy that maximizes his utility no matter what strategies other players uses. True or false?
  3. Consider a game where there is a dominant strategy equilibrium. You would then argue that, in equilibrium

a-Each player gets the highest utility he can possibly get

b-Total surplus is not necessarily maximized

c-Total surplus is systematically maximized

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Part i . This statement is true because a  dominant strategy equilibrium is reached when each player chooses their own dominant strategy that always provides greater utility to the player, no matter what the other player's strategy is

Part ii. This statement is false because Nash equilibrium is a concept within game theory where the optimal outcome of a game is where there is no incentive to deviate from their initial strategy. ... Overall, an individual can receive no incremental benefit from changing actions, assuming other players remain constant in their strategies.

Part III. I would argue in total surplus is systematically maximized because it is not measured systematically.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Which of the following is true for a Nash equilibrium of a two-player game? a) The...
Which of the following is true for a Nash equilibrium of a two-player game? a) The joint payoffs of the two players are highest compared to other strategy pairs. b) It is a combination of strategies that are best responses to each other.*? c) Every two-player game has a unique Nash equilibrium. d) None of the above is correct.
If only one player has a dominant strategy in a game with two players, will there...
If only one player has a dominant strategy in a game with two players, will there be a Nash equilibrium?
Which of the following conditions are necessary for the existence of a Nash equilibrium in a...
Which of the following conditions are necessary for the existence of a Nash equilibrium in a two-player game? None of the statements associated with this question are correct The existence of dominant strategies for both players The existence of a dominant strategy for at least one player Ability to achieve the highest combined payoff for the two players
1. Charging different prices for different units of a good is called: ☐ a. Monopoly power....
1. Charging different prices for different units of a good is called: ☐ a. Monopoly power. ☐ b. Index pricing. ☐ c. Price discrimination. ☐ d. Markup pricing. ☐ e. None of the above. 2. Which of the following statements is true: ☐ a. A Nash equilibrium is always a dominant strategy equilibrium. ☐ b. If there exists a dominant strategy equilibrium then there also exists a Nash equilibrium. ☐ c. There may be more than one dominant strategy equilibrium....
A game has two players. Each player has two possible strategies. One strategy is Cooperate, the...
A game has two players. Each player has two possible strategies. One strategy is Cooperate, the other is Defect. Each player writes on a piece of paper either a C for cooperate or a D for defect. If both players write C, they each get a payoff of $100. If both players write D, they each get a payoff of 0. If one player writes C and the other player writes D, the cooperating player gets a payoff of S...
4. Consider the following non-cooperative, 2-player game. Each player is a middle manager who wishes to...
4. Consider the following non-cooperative, 2-player game. Each player is a middle manager who wishes to get a promotion. To get the promotion, each player has two possible strategies: earn it through hard work (Work) or make the other person look bad through unscrupulous means (Nasty). The payoff matrix describing this game is shown below. The payoffs for each player are levels of utility—larger numbers are preferred to smaller numbers. Player 1’s payoffs are listed first in each box. Find...
When a Nash equilibrium is reached: a. the outcome will only change if the "lead" player...
When a Nash equilibrium is reached: a. the outcome will only change if the "lead" player changes his strategy b. everyone is happy c.it must be true that all players have a dominant strategy d.no one has an incentive to break the equilibrium by changing his strategy Assume there are three hardware stores in the market for hammers and that all three markets produce a single, standard model hammer. House Depot is an enormous mass producer of hammers and can...
Mike and Jake are basketball players who sometimes flop (that is, intentionally fall or feign an...
Mike and Jake are basketball players who sometimes flop (that is, intentionally fall or feign an injury in order to cause a foul on another player). It is better for each of them if both play fairly and don't flop then when both flop. But each player is better off flopping than not flopping. Their payoffs are given below. Jake Mike Flop Not Flop Flop (3, 3) (4, 1) Not Flop (1, 4) (1, 1) For instance, if Mike flops...
1. A Prisoners Dilemma illustrates the fact that a. ​Rational choices can lead to inefficient outcomes...
1. A Prisoners Dilemma illustrates the fact that a. ​Rational choices can lead to inefficient outcomes b. ​Rational choices always leads to good outcomes c. ​Rational choices always lead to inefficient outcomes d. ​None of the above 2. Two roommates John and Joe are playing a simultaneous game of cleaning the apartment. If neither of them clean, the apartment gets filthy and both get a utility of 2. If John cleans and Joe doesn’t, John gets a utility of 1...
Answer the following questions about oligopolistic markets for a simultaneous game in which Microsoft and Apple...
Answer the following questions about oligopolistic markets for a simultaneous game in which Microsoft and Apple decide whether to advertise or not. Players: Apple and Microsoft (MS) Strategies: Advertise (A) or No-Ads (NA) Payoffs: If both choose to A, Apple gets $8 billion revenue and MS gets $16 billion revenue; If Apple choose A and MS choose NA, Apple gets $15 billion and MS gets $12 billion; If Apple choose NA and MS choose A, Apple gets $10 billion and...