Question

1) a.draw the truth table for s: (p and r) or (q and not r) b....

1)

a.draw the truth table for s: (p and r) or (q and not r)

b. assuming s and q are true but p is false, deduce the value of r. explain

c. draw the truth table for s: r ---> not (p and q)

d. assuming q is true, deduce the values of s, p, and r. Explain

Homework Answers

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Construct an indirect truth table for this argument. ∼A • ∼(R ∨ Q)   /   B ≡ ∼Q   //  ...
Construct an indirect truth table for this argument. ∼A • ∼(R ∨ Q)   /   B ≡ ∼Q   //   B ⊃ J From your indirect truth table what can you conclude? The argument is valid and the value of the letter R is True. The argument is valid and the value of the letter R is False. The argument is invalid and the value of the letter R is True. The argument is invalid and the value of the letter R is False.
1. Construct a truth table for: (¬p ∨ (p → ¬q)) → (¬p ∨ ¬q) 2....
1. Construct a truth table for: (¬p ∨ (p → ¬q)) → (¬p ∨ ¬q) 2. Give a proof using logical equivalences that (p → q) ∨ (q → r) and (p → r) are not logically equivalent. 3.Show using a truth table that (p → q) and (¬q → ¬p) are logically equivalent. 4. Use the rules of inference to prove that the premise p ∧ (p → ¬q) implies the conclusion ¬q. Number each step and give the...
MATH LOGICALL TRUTH TABLE/ be able to follow the comment if P implies Q , P...
MATH LOGICALL TRUTH TABLE/ be able to follow the comment if P implies Q , P is false , Q is true , the outcome P implies Q is true. I don't understand becasue P imples Q, if the P is false and Q is true, then the statement P===> Q should be false. Please explain or hold some example in sentences
Write a C++ program to construct the truth table of P || !(Q && R)
Write a C++ program to construct the truth table of P || !(Q && R)
(1) Determine whether the propositions p → (q ∨ ¬r) and (p ∧ ¬q) → ¬r...
(1) Determine whether the propositions p → (q ∨ ¬r) and (p ∧ ¬q) → ¬r are logically equivalent using either a truth table or laws of logic. (2) Let A, B and C be sets. If a is the proposition “x ∈ A”, b is the proposition “x ∈ B” and c is the proposition “x ∈ C”, write down a proposition involving a, b and c that is logically equivalentto“x∈A∪(B−C)”. (3) Consider the statement ∀x∃y¬P(x,y). Write down a...
Use a truth table to determine whether the following argument is valid. p →q ∨ ∼r...
Use a truth table to determine whether the following argument is valid. p →q ∨ ∼r q → p ∧ r ∴ p →r
are they logically equivalent (show how) truth table or in word:: a) p —> ( q...
are they logically equivalent (show how) truth table or in word:: a) p —> ( q —> r ) and ( p -> q) —> r b) p^ (q v r ) and ( p ^ q) v ( p ^ r )
1) Show that ¬p → (q → r) and q → (p ∨ r) are logically...
1) Show that ¬p → (q → r) and q → (p ∨ r) are logically equivalent. No truth table and please state what law you're using. Also, please write neat and clear. Thanks 2) .Show that (p ∨ q) ∧ (¬p ∨ r) → (q ∨ r) is a tautology. No truth table and please state what law you're using. Also, please write neat and clear.
For each of the following propositions construct a truth table and indicate whether it is a...
For each of the following propositions construct a truth table and indicate whether it is a tautology (i.e., it’s always true), a contradiction (it’s never true), or a contingency (its truth depends on the truth of the variables). Also specify whether it is a logical equivalence or not. Note: There should be a column for every operator. There should be three columns to show work for a biconditional. c) (P V Q) Λ ( ¬(? Λ Q) Λ (¬?)) d)...
Prove a)p→q, r→s⊢p∨r→q∨s b)(p ∨ (q → p)) ∧ q ⊢ p
Prove a)p→q, r→s⊢p∨r→q∨s b)(p ∨ (q → p)) ∧ q ⊢ p