Question

One can infer causation from statistical correlation: if variables are highly correlated then one of the...

One can infer causation from statistical correlation: if variables are highly correlated then one of the variables must be causally related to the other. True or False.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Basically a causation is the relationship between cause and effect. So, when a cause results in an effect, that's a causation. It simply indicates that a relationship exists, whereas causation is more specific and says that one event actually causes the other. correlation does not imply a causation, it can also be said that a lack of correlation doesn't imply a lack of causation.

Hence the statement: One can infer causation from statistical correlation: if variables are highly correlated then one of the variables must be causally related to the other is FALSE.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Correlation =/= Causation A lot of data is correlated. In some cases, this is because one...
Correlation =/= Causation A lot of data is correlated. In some cases, this is because one variable causes another. In other cases, things are correlated and neither thing cause the other. I would like for you to think of one such example. 2 variables must be (believably) correlated, but one clearly doesn't cause the other. Thus, your response should have 4 parts to it... ~Thing 1 ~Thing 2 ~Ridiculous claim- thing 1 causes thing 2 or thing 2 causes thing...
One of the major misconceptions about correlation is that a relationship between two variables means causation;...
One of the major misconceptions about correlation is that a relationship between two variables means causation; that is, one variable causes changes in the other variable. There is a particular tendency to make this causal error, when the two variables seem to be related to each other. What is one instance where you have seen correlation misinterpreted as causation? Please describe Can you help me understand how to answer this question
One of the major misconceptions about correlation is that a relationship between two variables means causation;...
One of the major misconceptions about correlation is that a relationship between two variables means causation; that is, one variable causes changes in the other variable. There is a particular tendency to make this causal error, when the two variables seem to be related to each other. What is one instance where you have seen correlation misinterpreted as causation? Please describe. an orginal post please
6. True, False, Explain. Adding a variables to a regression that are highly correlated with the...
6. True, False, Explain. Adding a variables to a regression that are highly correlated with the independent variables already included but not with the dependent variable will increase your chance of committing type II errors when conducting tests of statistical significance on the estimated coefficients.
Describe an example in which two variables are strongly correlated, but changes in one does not...
Describe an example in which two variables are strongly correlated, but changes in one does not cause changes in the other. Does correlation imply causation?
TRUE OR FALE 1. Statistical correlation is equivalent to causation. 2. Causation occurs when a change...
TRUE OR FALE 1. Statistical correlation is equivalent to causation. 2. Causation occurs when a change in a variable causes change in another.
Can 2 variables be causally related without exhibiting a correlation? Use citations and references.
Can 2 variables be causally related without exhibiting a correlation? Use citations and references.
1. Describe and example in which two variables are strongly correlated, but changes in one does...
1. Describe and example in which two variables are strongly correlated, but changes in one does not cause changes in the other. Does correlation imply causation? 2. A) Give an example of two events that are mutually exclusive (disjoint). B) Given an example of two events that are not mutually exclusive (not disjoint).
Two variables, A and B, are correlated with Pearson’s r and the obtained correlation is -0.23....
Two variables, A and B, are correlated with Pearson’s r and the obtained correlation is -0.23. Both variables are then standardized to Z scores and the variables, now in Z scores, are correlated again. Will the correlation between the Z score format of A and B differ from the original correlation of -0.23? Explain how it may or may not differ and why?
correlation measures the degree to which two variables are related to one another. Here are the...
correlation measures the degree to which two variables are related to one another. Here are the definitions of the three possibilities: Positive correlations: In this type of correlation, both variables increase or decrease at the same time. A correlation coefficient close to +1.00 indicates a strong positive correlation. Negative correlations: This type of correlation indicates that as the amount of one variable increases, the other decreases (and vice versa). A correlation coefficient close to -1.00 indicates a strong negative correlation....
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT