Question

TRUE OR FALE 1. Statistical correlation is equivalent to causation. 2. Causation occurs when a change...

TRUE OR FALE
1.
Statistical correlation is equivalent to causation.
2.
Causation occurs when a change in a variable causes change in another.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

(1)

Since a correlation between two variables does not means that one causes the other. Correlation shows the relationship between the two variables and according to causation, one variable causes to change the another variables.

Hence the given statement "Statistical correlation is equivalent to causation" is false.

2.

When one variable causes to change the another variables, then it is said that it is causation.

Hence it can be said that Causation occurs when a change in a variable causes change in another.

Hence this statement is true.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
1. Correlation: Correlation Does Not Mean Causation One of the major misconceptions about correlation is that...
1. Correlation: Correlation Does Not Mean Causation One of the major misconceptions about correlation is that a relationship between two variables means causation; that is, one variable causes changes in the other variable. There is a particular tendency to make this causal error, when the two variables seem to be related to each other. What is one instance where you have seen correlation misinterpreted as causation? Please describe.
One can infer causation from statistical correlation: if variables are highly correlated then one of the...
One can infer causation from statistical correlation: if variables are highly correlated then one of the variables must be causally related to the other. True or False.
Correlation =/= Causation A lot of data is correlated. In some cases, this is because one...
Correlation =/= Causation A lot of data is correlated. In some cases, this is because one variable causes another. In other cases, things are correlated and neither thing cause the other. I would like for you to think of one such example. 2 variables must be (believably) correlated, but one clearly doesn't cause the other. Thus, your response should have 4 parts to it... ~Thing 1 ~Thing 2 ~Ridiculous claim- thing 1 causes thing 2 or thing 2 causes thing...
One of the major misconceptions about correlation is that a relationship between two variables means causation;...
One of the major misconceptions about correlation is that a relationship between two variables means causation; that is, one variable causes changes in the other variable. There is a particular tendency to make this causal error, when the two variables seem to be related to each other. What is one instance where you have seen correlation misinterpreted as causation? Please describe. an orginal post please
One of the major misconceptions about correlation is that a relationship between two variables means causation;...
One of the major misconceptions about correlation is that a relationship between two variables means causation; that is, one variable causes changes in the other variable. There is a particular tendency to make this causal error, when the two variables seem to be related to each other. What is one instance where you have seen correlation misinterpreted as causation? Please describe Can you help me understand how to answer this question
1. Assess the implications for professional practice when a researcher implies causation after using correlation (e.g.,...
1. Assess the implications for professional practice when a researcher implies causation after using correlation (e.g., bivariate correlation) analyses. 2. Explain why the results of bivariate correlation analyses are considered weak in terms of internal validity. 3. Explain how would you extend or modify a research design to examine a true cause-and-effect relationship.
TRUE OR FALSE: 1. When the correlation coefficient is close to -1, that means that there...
TRUE OR FALSE: 1. When the correlation coefficient is close to -1, that means that there is no relationship between the independent variable and the dependent variable. 2. When the correlation coefficient is close to -1, that means that there is no relationship between the independent variable and the dependent variable. 3. A correlation coefficient of -0.96 would mean that the values of y decrease as the values of x increase.
Statistical control is ... 1. Always effective 2. Good enough to prove causation 3. Only as...
Statistical control is ... 1. Always effective 2. Good enough to prove causation 3. Only as good as your measurement 4. Sufficient enough to replace A/B testing and experiments
When you are presented with a Pearson’s correlation coefficient between two variables for which an increase...
When you are presented with a Pearson’s correlation coefficient between two variables for which an increase in one predicts a decrease in the other, and vice versa, the Pearson’s number will be zero; the Pearson number is only meaningful if the variables move in the same direction as one another close to -1 if the correlation is strong, negative but near zero if the correlation is weak close to -1 if the correlation is strong, close to +1 if the...
1. True or Fale A. Social science often debunks common-sense ideas. B.Evaluation research may be used...
1. True or Fale A. Social science often debunks common-sense ideas. B.Evaluation research may be used to determine the effectiveness of a social policy. C.Measurement of a variable of interest can be done in many ways. D.Culture shock refers to the personal disorientation that people feel when they visit a culture that is similar to theirs. E.Subculture refers to distinctive lifestyles and values shared by a category of people within a society. F.Societies seldom change over time. G.Both structural functionalism...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT