Question

1. Correlation: Correlation Does Not Mean Causation One of the major misconceptions about correlation is that...

1. Correlation: Correlation Does Not Mean Causation

One of the major misconceptions about correlation is that a relationship between two variables means causation; that is, one variable causes changes in the other variable. There is a particular tendency to make this causal error, when the two variables seem to be related to each other.

What is one instance where you have seen correlation misinterpreted as causation? Please describe.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

correlation doesn't infer/imply causation in the event that two quantities are corresponded, at that point there likely could be a geninue cause advertisement impact relationship however might be different factors are driving both or maybe its fair coincidence.where ever causation is present,we must be careful not to mix up the reason with the impact or else we may finish up/conclude

for example:

That an increased use of heaters causes colder climate/weather.

In order to establish cause and effect, we have to go beyond the statistics and search for separate.Evidence and logical reasoning,correlation may incite us to go searching for such evidence in the first place,but it is no methods a proof,in its own right.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
One of the major misconceptions about correlation is that a relationship between two variables means causation;...
One of the major misconceptions about correlation is that a relationship between two variables means causation; that is, one variable causes changes in the other variable. There is a particular tendency to make this causal error, when the two variables seem to be related to each other. What is one instance where you have seen correlation misinterpreted as causation? Please describe. an orginal post please
One of the major misconceptions about correlation is that a relationship between two variables means causation;...
One of the major misconceptions about correlation is that a relationship between two variables means causation; that is, one variable causes changes in the other variable. There is a particular tendency to make this causal error, when the two variables seem to be related to each other. What is one instance where you have seen correlation misinterpreted as causation? Please describe Can you help me understand how to answer this question
Does correlation mean the same thing as causation? In other words, if there exists a strong...
Does correlation mean the same thing as causation? In other words, if there exists a strong correlation between two variables, does that necessarily mean that one variable causes the other? Support your answer with examples.
One hears versions of the expression "correlation does not mean causation" so often - especially as...
One hears versions of the expression "correlation does not mean causation" so often - especially as a graduate student - that it can be easy to accept the statement as true without giving the matter some careful consideration. Is it ALWAYS true that correlation does not imply (or suggest) causation? Does correlation NEVER imply (or suggest) causation? Are there any conditions under which we might have good reason to think that a causal relationship does exist on the basis of...
Correlation =/= Causation A lot of data is correlated. In some cases, this is because one...
Correlation =/= Causation A lot of data is correlated. In some cases, this is because one variable causes another. In other cases, things are correlated and neither thing cause the other. I would like for you to think of one such example. 2 variables must be (believably) correlated, but one clearly doesn't cause the other. Thus, your response should have 4 parts to it... ~Thing 1 ~Thing 2 ~Ridiculous claim- thing 1 causes thing 2 or thing 2 causes thing...
Describe an example in which two variables are strongly correlated, but changes in one does not...
Describe an example in which two variables are strongly correlated, but changes in one does not cause changes in the other. Does correlation imply causation?
correlation measures the degree to which two variables are related to one another. Here are the...
correlation measures the degree to which two variables are related to one another. Here are the definitions of the three possibilities: Positive correlations: In this type of correlation, both variables increase or decrease at the same time. A correlation coefficient close to +1.00 indicates a strong positive correlation. Negative correlations: This type of correlation indicates that as the amount of one variable increases, the other decreases (and vice versa). A correlation coefficient close to -1.00 indicates a strong negative correlation....
1. Describe and example in which two variables are strongly correlated, but changes in one does...
1. Describe and example in which two variables are strongly correlated, but changes in one does not cause changes in the other. Does correlation imply causation? 2. A) Give an example of two events that are mutually exclusive (disjoint). B) Given an example of two events that are not mutually exclusive (not disjoint).
1)Adding an outlier in a scatterplot will do which of the following to the correlation coefficient?...
1)Adding an outlier in a scatterplot will do which of the following to the correlation coefficient? Explain a) Increase the correlation coefficient b) Decrease the correlation coefficient c) Change the correlation coefficient from positive to negative d) Change the correlation coefficient from negative to positive e) All options above are possible   2) When the correlation coefficient is close to +1, it indicates. Please explain a) changes in one variable cause changes in the other, but we don't know which one...
For each of the following pairs of variables, indicate whether you would expect a positive correlation,...
For each of the following pairs of variables, indicate whether you would expect a positive correlation, a negative correlation, or little or no correlation. For the ones which are correlated, is the relationship causal? If so, which one causes (or at least influences) the other? If not, suggest a third variable which might be related to both. a:The number of cavities in elementary school children and their vocabulary size. b:The number of fire engines at each fire and the damage...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT