Question

Describe an example in which two variables are strongly correlated, but changes in one does not...

Describe an example in which two variables are strongly correlated, but changes in one does not cause changes in the other. Does correlation imply causation?

Math   Statistics-And-Probability   
0 0
Add a commentTranscribed image text
Next >

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Example in which two variables are strongly correlated, but changes in one does not cause changes in the other.

Variable 1: Ice cream Sales

Variable 2: Sunglasses sold

We note that Ice cream Sales and Sunglasses sold are strongly positively correlated. As the Ice cream Sales goes up, correspondingly Sunglasses sold also goes up. But, Sunglasses sold is not the cause of Ice cream Sales. Correlation does not imply correlation. Correlation just tells us how the 2 variables: Variable 1: Ice cream Sales and Variable 2: Sunglasses sold are linearly related. Causation says any change in the value of one variable causes change in the value of the other variable. The correlation between Ice cream Sales and Sunglasses sold is due to the presence of the Confounding Variable: Temperature. Since it very hot, both ice cream as well as sun glasses are sold more.

0 0
Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Log In

Sign Up

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
1. Describe and example in which two variables are strongly correlated, but changes in one does...
1. Describe and example in which two variables are strongly correlated, but changes in one does not cause changes in the other. Does correlation imply causation? 2. A) Give an example of two events that are mutually exclusive (disjoint). B) Given an example of two events that are not mutually exclusive (not disjoint).
One can infer causation from statistical correlation: if variables are highly correlated then one of the...
One can infer causation from statistical correlation: if variables are highly correlated then one of the variables must be causally related to the other. True or False.
Two factors cannot be strongly positively correlated without one of them being the cause of the...
Two factors cannot be strongly positively correlated without one of them being the cause of the other. True False
1. Correlation: Correlation Does Not Mean Causation One of the major misconceptions about correlation is that...
1. Correlation: Correlation Does Not Mean Causation One of the major misconceptions about correlation is that a relationship between two variables means causation; that is, one variable causes changes in the other variable. There is a particular tendency to make this causal error, when the two variables seem to be related to each other. What is one instance where you have seen correlation misinterpreted as causation? Please describe.
Correlation =/= Causation A lot of data is correlated. In some cases, this is because one...
Correlation =/= Causation A lot of data is correlated. In some cases, this is because one variable causes another. In other cases, things are correlated and neither thing cause the other. I would like for you to think of one such example. 2 variables must be (believably) correlated, but one clearly doesn't cause the other. Thus, your response should have 4 parts to it... ~Thing 1 ~Thing 2 ~Ridiculous claim- thing 1 causes thing 2 or thing 2 causes thing...
One of the major misconceptions about correlation is that a relationship between two variables means causation;...
One of the major misconceptions about correlation is that a relationship between two variables means causation; that is, one variable causes changes in the other variable. There is a particular tendency to make this causal error, when the two variables seem to be related to each other. What is one instance where you have seen correlation misinterpreted as causation? Please describe. an orginal post please
One of the major misconceptions about correlation is that a relationship between two variables means causation;...
One of the major misconceptions about correlation is that a relationship between two variables means causation; that is, one variable causes changes in the other variable. There is a particular tendency to make this causal error, when the two variables seem to be related to each other. What is one instance where you have seen correlation misinterpreted as causation? Please describe Can you help me understand how to answer this question
An example of two very unusual variables that are correlated.
An example of two very unusual variables that are correlated.
If two variables are/ have a strong linear correlation, does this mean that one is the...
If two variables are/ have a strong linear correlation, does this mean that one is the cause of the other? Give your opinion and support it with examples
1) In your own words, explain the differences parametric and nonparametric tests. Also noted which kind...
1) In your own words, explain the differences parametric and nonparametric tests. Also noted which kind is preferred to be used. 2) Pictured below is an obvious example of correlation vs. causation. The sun causes ice cream to melt. The sun also causes people to get sunburns. However, melting ice cream does not cause sunburns and vice versa; instead, those variables are correlated with one another. Provide another obvious example of correlation vs. causation. You may not use an example...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT