Question

If only one player has a dominant strategy in a game with two players, will there...

If only one player has a dominant strategy in a game with two players, will there be a Nash equilibrium?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

A strategy is said to be dominant if, the pay off the strategy is largest among the available strategy to this players regardless of strategy chosen by other players. Hence, it can be said that a strategy is dominant if it is always superior, compare to any other strategy, for any profile of other player’s action

Since the Nash equilibrium occurs when every player wants to choose the best possible strategy, given the strategies of another player. Once the Nash equilibrium is reached, there is no incentive to change the strategy by the both players.

Hence it can be said that If only one player has a dominant strategy in a game with two players, there will not be a Nash equilibrium.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Fill in a payoff matrix for a prisoner’s dilemma game where one player has a dominant...
Fill in a payoff matrix for a prisoner’s dilemma game where one player has a dominant strategy and the other doesn’t. Firm 2 in Duopoly Firm 1 in Duopoly a. Explain the dominant and non-dominant strategy of the firms. b. Is there a Nash equilibrium in your game? Explain.
A game has two players. Each player has two possible strategies. One strategy is Cooperate, the...
A game has two players. Each player has two possible strategies. One strategy is Cooperate, the other is Defect. Each player writes on a piece of paper either a C for cooperate or a D for defect. If both players write C, they each get a payoff of $100. If both players write D, they each get a payoff of 0. If one player writes C and the other player writes D, the cooperating player gets a payoff of S...
In a dominant strategy equilibrium a player uses a strategy that maximizes his utility no matter...
In a dominant strategy equilibrium a player uses a strategy that maximizes his utility no matter what strategies other players use.  True or false? In a nash equilibrium a player uses the strategy that maximizes his utility no matter what strategies other players uses. True or false? Consider a game where there is a dominant strategy equilibrium. You would then argue that, in equilibrium a-Each player gets the highest utility he can possibly get b-Total surplus is not necessarily maximized c-Total...
a. i. If a game has a dominant strategy equilibrium, does it have a Nash equilibrium?...
a. i. If a game has a dominant strategy equilibrium, does it have a Nash equilibrium? ii. If a game has a Nash equilibrium, does it have a dominant strategy equilibrium? iii. If one firm has a dominant strategy, can another firm take advantage of that fact in deciding on its optimal strategy? iv. Can a game have more than one dominant strategy equilibrium? v. Can a game have more than one Nash equilibrium? b) There are only two firms...
Consider a game where both players have a dominant strategy. In this type of game ___...
Consider a game where both players have a dominant strategy. In this type of game ___ a.strategic interactions play no role b.the optimal decision for both players does not depend on the behavior of the other player c.each player is expected to play her dominant strategy irrespective of the strategy selected by the other player d.all of the above are correct e.none of the above are correct
Which of the following is true for a Nash equilibrium of a two-player game? a) The...
Which of the following is true for a Nash equilibrium of a two-player game? a) The joint payoffs of the two players are highest compared to other strategy pairs. b) It is a combination of strategies that are best responses to each other.*? c) Every two-player game has a unique Nash equilibrium. d) None of the above is correct.
Game Theory: John and Dave are playing a game where they only have two strategies, either...
Game Theory: John and Dave are playing a game where they only have two strategies, either to move left or move right. The payoffs from this game are the points that each player will earn given the strategies that each play. The higher the points, the higher the payoffs each player will receive. The normal form representation of the game is presented below.                                                    DAVE                         Left                                                  Right Left 1,1 0,3 Right 3,0 2,2 John's name label should be on...
In a game, a Nash equilibrium is reached only if the players: understand the game and...
In a game, a Nash equilibrium is reached only if the players: understand the game and the payoffs associated with each strategy. use backward induction method to develop their strategies. follow a mixed strategy. have no best response for the choices made by other players.
4. Consider a two-player game with strategy sets S1 = {α1, . . . , αm}...
4. Consider a two-player game with strategy sets S1 = {α1, . . . , αm} and S2 = {β1, . . . , βn}. (a) Suppose that (αi , βj ) is a Nash equilibrium. Is it possible that a strategy αj strictly dominates αi? (b) Assume again that (αi , βj ) is a Nash equilibrium. Is it possible that another strategy αj weakly dominates αi?
The next two questions will refer to the following game table: Player 2 S T F...
The next two questions will refer to the following game table: Player 2 S T F 7, 3 2, 4 Player 1 G 5, 2 6, 1 H 6, 1 5, 4 Question1. This game has one mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium in which Player 1 uses a mixed strategy consisting only of F and H. Find this MSNE, and fill in the blanks below to state it formally: P(F) = P(G) = P(H) = P(S) = P(T) = Question2 This game...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT