Question

Test Reliability and Screening: What impact does a test with high negative predictive value have on...

Test Reliability and Screening: What impact does a test with high negative predictive value have on diagnostic test interpretation?

Math   Statistics-And-Probability   
0 0
Add a commentTranscribed image text
Next >

Homework Answers

Answer #1

To answer this let us know what is negative predictive value

Negative predictive value is the probability that a subject really does not have a disease, that is the test is negative and the subject does not have a disease.

High negative predictive value has a positive impact on the diagnostic test because out of all those who have testing negative, high percentage of subjects are really negative.

Having a high negative predictive value is preferred because if this is low then there may be many subjects who have the disease but are tested negative which is really harmful for everyone.

Thank you!!!

0 0
Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Log In

Sign Up

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
what is the correct answer.. 1- In raising the cutoff point for a screening test, which...
what is the correct answer.. 1- In raising the cutoff point for a screening test, which of the following is the likely result? A An increase in sensitivity B An increase in specificity C An increase in false positives D An increase in prevalence E An increase in lead time bias 2- If the screening test does not delay the time of death from a condition but makes survival appear longer because of earlier detection of disease, there is evidence...
Please calculate the positive predictive value and negative predictive value for a serology test with a...
Please calculate the positive predictive value and negative predictive value for a serology test with a 95% sensitivity and 90% specificity with a 10% prevalence rate (show your work in calculation).
1. Twenty -four percent of those with diagnosed diabetes tested negative on a screening test for...
1. Twenty -four percent of those with diagnosed diabetes tested negative on a screening test for the disease. This type of screening measure is known as: a. False negative rate b. True positive rate c. False positive rate d. Negative predictive value
A screening test for a newly discovered disease is being evaluated. In order to determine the...
A screening test for a newly discovered disease is being evaluated. In order to determine the effectiveness of the new test, it was administered to 900 workers. 150 of the individuals diagnosed with the disease tested positive. A negative test finding occurred in 60 people who had the disease. A total of 50 persons not diseased tested positive for it. Assume the prior probability is not known. What was the sensitivity of the test? What was the specificity of the...
You will be assessing the appropriateness of a new screening test for Disease X. Assume a...
You will be assessing the appropriateness of a new screening test for Disease X. Assume a population of 1000 people of whom 100 have Disease X and 900 do not have Disease X to answer questions a through i using the following 2x2 table: Disease No Disease Positive screen 80 100 Negative screen 20 800 1.      Calculate the sensitivity. 2.      Interpret your sensitivity calculation and the implications for potential use of this screening test. 3.       Calculate the specificity. 4.      Interpret your specificity calculation and...
Community health workers were conducting a screening test for diabetes. People who tested positive on the...
Community health workers were conducting a screening test for diabetes. People who tested positive on the screening test were referred for follow-up testing to confirm if they had diabetes. There were 300 people who tested positive during the screening in the community. Thirty of these people were later found to not have diabetes. There were 500 people who tested negative during the screening in the community. The community health workers later found out that 20 of the people who tested...
d) Assume that the same screening test is applied to a high-risk population of intravenous drug...
d) Assume that the same screening test is applied to a high-risk population of intravenous drug users, who are at high risk of AIDS. If you had access to 1,000 IV drug users and could obtain permission to test them for HIV antibody status, and if past studies have estimated that 20% of IV drug users are truly HIV positive, what value will you obtain for the positive predictive value (PPV) in this population? Hint: you have to calculate again...
Suppose that a screening test for breast cancer has 95% sensitivity and 90% specificity. Assume 1%...
Suppose that a screening test for breast cancer has 95% sensitivity and 90% specificity. Assume 1% of the population being screened truly has breast cancer. a. If you really do have breast cancer, what is the probability that the test says you do? b. If you really do not have breast cancer, what is the probability that the test says you do? c. The screening test is applied to a total of 15 people; 5 who really do have cancer...
Table 1 below shows results obtained in a new screening test for diabetes. 10,000 people were...
Table 1 below shows results obtained in a new screening test for diabetes. 10,000 people were screened. The cut-off level employed was 180mg of blood glucose per 100 ml. Everyone scoring above this level was classified as positive for diabetes. Everyone scoring below this level was classified as negative for diabetes. These results were compared to a “gold standard” test for diabetes that is considered to be completely valid. Compute and interpret the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and...
A screening test applied to 1500 subjects identified 250 of them as positive. On further investigation,...
A screening test applied to 1500 subjects identified 250 of them as positive. On further investigation, 110 of these were found to have the disease being tested for. In subsequent follow-up, 20 of the subjects who tested negative developed the disease within a reasonably short time. Calculate the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of the test. Explain in words what a test specificity of 75% means? Would you recommend using this screening test? Explain your answer.
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT