Question

Table 1 below shows results obtained in a new screening test for diabetes. 10,000 people were screened. The cut-off level employed was 180mg of blood glucose per 100 ml. Everyone scoring above this level was classified as positive for diabetes. Everyone scoring below this level was classified as negative for diabetes. These results were compared to a “gold standard” test for diabetes that is considered to be completely valid. Compute and interpret the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the new screening test.

Table 1.

"Gold-Standard" Test |
|||

Screening |
Disease |
No Disease |
Total |

Positive |
125 |
25 |
150 |

Negative |
375 |
9475 |
9850 |

Total |
500 |
9500 |
10000 |

- Calculate the following measures for this screening test:

Sensitivity =

Specificity =

PPV =

NPV =

Answer #1

Answer: Table 1 below shows results obtained in a new screening test for diabetes. 10,000 people were screened. The cut-off level employed was 180mg of blood glucose per 100 ml. Everyone scoring above this level was classified as positive for diabetes. Everyone scoring below this level was classified as negative for diabetes.

Solution:

a)

Sensitivity = (True positive / Total disease)*100

Sensitivity = (125/500)*100

**Sensitivity** **= 25%**

Specificity = (True negative/Total no disease)*100

Specificity = (9475/9500)*100

**Specificity = 99.7368% = 99.74%**

PPV = (True positive/Total test positive)*100

PPV = (125/150)*100

**PPV = 83.33%**

NPV = (True negative/Total test negative)*100

NPV = (9475/9850)*100

**NPV = 96.1929% = 96.20%**

Diabetes Screening
Shown below are the real-life diagnostic characteristics of a
particular diabetes-screening test – a fasting venous glucose
measurement – from a hypothetical cross-sectional study population.
Calculate the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive
value (PPV) of this screening test and estimate the prevalence of
diabetes in the study population.
Table: Results of fasting venous glucose screening for
diabetes.
Diabetes Screening Test
Actual diabetes status
Total
Present
Absent
Positive (+)
True +
67
False +
38
Total +
105
Negative...

Community health workers were conducting a screening test for
diabetes. People who tested positive on the screening test were
referred for follow-up testing to confirm if they had diabetes.
There were 300 people who tested positive
during the screening in the community. Thirty of these people were
later found to not have diabetes. There
were 500 people who tested negative during the screening in the
community. The community health workers later found out that 20 of
the people who tested...

You will be assessing the appropriateness of a new screening
test for Disease X. Assume a population of 1000 people of whom 100
have Disease X and 900 do not have Disease X to answer questions a
through i using the following 2x2 table:
Disease
No Disease
Positive screen
80
100
Negative screen
20
800
1. Calculate the
sensitivity.
2. Interpret your sensitivity
calculation and the implications for potential use of this
screening test.
3. Calculate the
specificity.
4. Interpret your specificity
calculation and...

Question 1.
The main purpose of screening is to identify symptomatic disease
using tests, exams, or other procedures.
True
False
Question 2.
The detectable pre-clinical phase of a disease starts when the
disease can be identified by a screening test and ends when the
disease produces symptoms.
True
False
Question 3
.Diseases that are appropriate for screening…
a.
Have serious consequences
b.
Have a treatment that is more effective at an earlier stage
c.
Have a detectable preclinical phase that...

A new screening test for COVID-19 was administered to 1,000
adults at a large medical center in Texas. The results showed that
152 out of 160 diagnosed cases of COVID-19 were correctly
identified by the screening test. Of the 840 individuals without
COVID-19, the screening test correctly identified 714. Based upon
this information:
1. Calculate the test's sensitivity, specificity, and the
positive and negative predictive values.
2. Calculate the prevalence rate of COVID-19 in this population
and the accuracy of...

A screening test applied to 1500 subjects identified 250 of them
as positive. On further investigation, 110 of these were found to
have the disease being tested for. In subsequent follow-up, 20 of
the subjects who tested negative developed the disease within a
reasonably short time. Calculate the sensitivity, specificity, and
positive predictive value of the test. Explain in words what a test
specificity of 75% means? Would you recommend using this screening
test? Explain your answer.

1. Twenty -four percent of those with diagnosed diabetes tested
negative on a screening test for the disease. This type of
screening measure is known as:
a. False negative rate
b. True positive rate
c. False positive rate
d. Negative predictive value

The following are data from a Primary Care Practice (PCP) who
sees 80% people who are on Medicare.
In 2019, the PCP saw 6,000 individuals for 18,322 visits. Since
the population the practice sees is over 65, they regularly screen
for diabetes every year. Prior to 2019, 10% of the patients had
tested positive to diabetes. In 2019, the practice screened people
for diabetes and found that 20% screened positive. Of those who
screened positive, 80% were confirmed to have...

A screening test for a newly discovered disease is being
evaluated. In order to determine the effectiveness of the new test,
it was administered to 900 workers. 150 of the individuals
diagnosed with the disease tested positive. A negative test finding
occurred in 60 people who had the disease. A total of 50 persons
not diseased tested positive for it. Assume the prior probability
is not known.
What was the sensitivity of the test?
What was the specificity of the...

The following are data from a Primary Care Practice (PCP) who
sees 80% people who are on Medicare.
In 2019, the PCP saw 6,000 individuals for 18,322 visits. Since
the population the practice sees is over 65, they regularly screen
for diabetes every year. Prior to 2019, 10% of the patients had
tested positive to diabetes. In 2019, the practice screened people
for diabetes and found that 20% screened positive. Of those who
screened positive, 80% were confirmed to have...

ADVERTISEMENT

Get Answers For Free

Most questions answered within 1 hours.

ADVERTISEMENT

asked 1 minute ago

asked 6 minutes ago

asked 27 minutes ago

asked 45 minutes ago

asked 51 minutes ago

asked 52 minutes ago

asked 54 minutes ago

asked 59 minutes ago

asked 1 hour ago

asked 1 hour ago

asked 1 hour ago

asked 1 hour ago