Question

1. Twenty -four percent of those with diagnosed diabetes tested negative on a screening test for...

1. Twenty -four percent of those with diagnosed diabetes tested negative on a screening test for the disease. This type of screening measure is known as:

a. False negative rate

b. True positive rate

c. False positive rate

d. Negative predictive value

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Twenty four percent of those with diagnosed diabetes, tested negative on a screening test for the disease.

The negative predictive value is defined as the number of true negatives (people who test negative who are not infected) divided by the total number of people who test negative.

A false negative is a test result that indicates a person does not have a disease or condition when the person actually does have it.

A true positive test is a result that indicates the rate of actual positives, out of those tested positive.

But, in this problem, the screening test finds the percentage of people who tested positive even though they are actually negative.

So, this type of screening measure is an example of option (c) False positive rate.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Community health workers were conducting a screening test for diabetes. People who tested positive on the...
Community health workers were conducting a screening test for diabetes. People who tested positive on the screening test were referred for follow-up testing to confirm if they had diabetes. There were 300 people who tested positive during the screening in the community. Thirty of these people were later found to not have diabetes. There were 500 people who tested negative during the screening in the community. The community health workers later found out that 20 of the people who tested...
Table 1 below shows results obtained in a new screening test for diabetes. 10,000 people were...
Table 1 below shows results obtained in a new screening test for diabetes. 10,000 people were screened. The cut-off level employed was 180mg of blood glucose per 100 ml. Everyone scoring above this level was classified as positive for diabetes. Everyone scoring below this level was classified as negative for diabetes. These results were compared to a “gold standard” test for diabetes that is considered to be completely valid. Compute and interpret the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and...
A screening test for a newly discovered disease is being evaluated. In order to determine the...
A screening test for a newly discovered disease is being evaluated. In order to determine the effectiveness of the new test, it was administered to 900 workers. 150 of the individuals diagnosed with the disease tested positive. A negative test finding occurred in 60 people who had the disease. A total of 50 persons not diseased tested positive for it. Assume the prior probability is not known. What was the sensitivity of the test? What was the specificity of the...
Diabetes Screening Shown below are the real-life diagnostic characteristics of a particular diabetes-screening test – a...
Diabetes Screening Shown below are the real-life diagnostic characteristics of a particular diabetes-screening test – a fasting venous glucose measurement – from a hypothetical cross-sectional study population. Calculate the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of this screening test and estimate the prevalence of diabetes in the study population. Table: Results of fasting venous glucose screening for diabetes. Diabetes Screening Test Actual diabetes status Total Present Absent Positive (+) True + 67 False + 38 Total + 105 Negative...
Question 1. The main purpose of screening is to identify symptomatic disease using tests, exams, or...
Question 1. The main purpose of screening is to identify symptomatic disease using tests, exams, or other procedures. True False Question 2. The detectable pre-clinical phase of a disease starts when the disease can be identified by a screening test and ends when the disease produces symptoms. True False Question 3 .Diseases that are appropriate for screening… a. Have serious consequences b. Have a treatment that is more effective at an earlier stage c. Have a detectable preclinical phase that...
what is the correct answer.. 1- In raising the cutoff point for a screening test, which...
what is the correct answer.. 1- In raising the cutoff point for a screening test, which of the following is the likely result? A An increase in sensitivity B An increase in specificity C An increase in false positives D An increase in prevalence E An increase in lead time bias 2- If the screening test does not delay the time of death from a condition but makes survival appear longer because of earlier detection of disease, there is evidence...
Suppose that a medical test run on 372 people resulted in 38 positive results. Of those,...
Suppose that a medical test run on 372 people resulted in 38 positive results. Of those, 22 people were eventually confirmed to have the illness. Among the people who tested negative, 3 were eventually diagnosed through other means, and the rest were healthy. Find the sensitivity of the test, the specificity of the test, and the positive and negative predictive values. The positive predictive value is the probability that a person is ill given that they tested positive, and the...
A screening test applied to 1500 subjects identified 250 of them as positive. On further investigation,...
A screening test applied to 1500 subjects identified 250 of them as positive. On further investigation, 110 of these were found to have the disease being tested for. In subsequent follow-up, 20 of the subjects who tested negative developed the disease within a reasonably short time. Calculate the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of the test. Explain in words what a test specificity of 75% means? Would you recommend using this screening test? Explain your answer.
You will be assessing the appropriateness of a new screening test for Disease X. Assume a...
You will be assessing the appropriateness of a new screening test for Disease X. Assume a population of 1000 people of whom 100 have Disease X and 900 do not have Disease X to answer questions a through i using the following 2x2 table: Disease No Disease Positive screen 80 100 Negative screen 20 800 1.      Calculate the sensitivity. 2.      Interpret your sensitivity calculation and the implications for potential use of this screening test. 3.       Calculate the specificity. 4.      Interpret your specificity calculation and...
Suppose that a screening test for breast cancer has 95% sensitivity and 90% specificity. Assume 1%...
Suppose that a screening test for breast cancer has 95% sensitivity and 90% specificity. Assume 1% of the population being screened truly has breast cancer. a. If you really do have breast cancer, what is the probability that the test says you do? b. If you really do not have breast cancer, what is the probability that the test says you do? c. The screening test is applied to a total of 15 people; 5 who really do have cancer...