Question

You will be assessing the appropriateness of a new screening test for Disease X. Assume a...

You will be assessing the appropriateness of a new screening test for Disease X. Assume a population of 1000 people of whom 100 have Disease X and 900 do not have Disease X to answer questions a through i using the following 2x2 table:

Disease No Disease
Positive screen 80 100
Negative screen 20 800

1.      Calculate the sensitivity.

2.      Interpret your sensitivity calculation and the implications for potential use of this screening test.

3.       Calculate the specificity.

4.      Interpret your specificity calculation and the implications for potential use of this screening test.

5.       Calculate the predictive value of a positive test?

6.       Interpret the above calculation and the implications for potential use of this screening test.

7.      Calculate the predictive value of a negative test?

8.      Interpret the above calculation and the implications for potential use of this screening test.

9.        What is your assessment of the use of this screening test for Disease X in practice? Should it be used? Why or why not?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

1. Sensitivity = 8/10

2. the result comes out to be that 80% of people, it shows that the probability of people having the disease amongst the disease. Sensitivity is two-thirds, so the test is able to detect two-thirds of the people with the disease. The test misses one-third of the people who have a disease.

3. Specificity = 8/9

4. the result comes out to be that 8/9 people, which is a fraction of those that will not have the disease.

5. A/(A+B)*100 = 80/(80+100)*100 = 44.44%

6. this means that of the people that had a positive test only 44.44% actually have the disease.

7. D/(D+C) *100 = 97.56%

8. for the people that tested negative, 97.56% does not have the disease.

9. all tests have advantages and disadvantages, such that no test is perfect. There is no free lunch in disease screening and early detection.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
You are evaluating a the sensitivity and specificity of a screening test. Disease Positive Disease Negative...
You are evaluating a the sensitivity and specificity of a screening test. Disease Positive Disease Negative Screen Positive 20 150 Screen Negative 5 9640 Calculate the sensitivity of the screening test. Calculate the specificity of the screening test.
Table 1 below shows results obtained in a new screening test for diabetes. 10,000 people were...
Table 1 below shows results obtained in a new screening test for diabetes. 10,000 people were screened. The cut-off level employed was 180mg of blood glucose per 100 ml. Everyone scoring above this level was classified as positive for diabetes. Everyone scoring below this level was classified as negative for diabetes. These results were compared to a “gold standard” test for diabetes that is considered to be completely valid. Compute and interpret the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and...
True Disease Status Positive Negative Positive 25 60 Nagative 200 300 Based on these data, calculate...
True Disease Status Positive Negative Positive 25 60 Nagative 200 300 Based on these data, calculate the test's sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the accuracy of the screening test, respectively. Interpret your findings. Would you recommend that this test be used to screen for COVID19 in general populations, and why or why not? show step-by-step calculations please
A screening test for a newly discovered disease is being evaluated. In order to determine the...
A screening test for a newly discovered disease is being evaluated. In order to determine the effectiveness of the new test, it was administered to 900 workers. 150 of the individuals diagnosed with the disease tested positive. A negative test finding occurred in 60 people who had the disease. A total of 50 persons not diseased tested positive for it. Assume the prior probability is not known. What was the sensitivity of the test? What was the specificity of the...
Using the following 2x2 table calculate the prevalence of the disease , sensitivity of the test,...
Using the following 2x2 table calculate the prevalence of the disease , sensitivity of the test, specificity of the test , predictive value of a positive test Disease Present Absent Test Result Positive 34 20 Negative 116 9830 Prevalence Sensitivity Specificity Predictivity value of a positive test A. 99.7% B. 31% C. 63% D. 1.5% E. 59% F. 22.6% G. 25%
A screening test applied to 1500 subjects identified 250 of them as positive. On further investigation,...
A screening test applied to 1500 subjects identified 250 of them as positive. On further investigation, 110 of these were found to have the disease being tested for. In subsequent follow-up, 20 of the subjects who tested negative developed the disease within a reasonably short time. Calculate the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of the test. Explain in words what a test specificity of 75% means? Would you recommend using this screening test? Explain your answer.
Community health workers were conducting a screening test for diabetes. People who tested positive on the...
Community health workers were conducting a screening test for diabetes. People who tested positive on the screening test were referred for follow-up testing to confirm if they had diabetes. There were 300 people who tested positive during the screening in the community. Thirty of these people were later found to not have diabetes. There were 500 people who tested negative during the screening in the community. The community health workers later found out that 20 of the people who tested...
Suppose that a screening test for breast cancer has 95% sensitivity and 90% specificity. Assume 1%...
Suppose that a screening test for breast cancer has 95% sensitivity and 90% specificity. Assume 1% of the population being screened truly has breast cancer. a. If you really do have breast cancer, what is the probability that the test says you do? b. If you really do not have breast cancer, what is the probability that the test says you do? c. The screening test is applied to a total of 15 people; 5 who really do have cancer...
A new screening test for COVID-19 was administered to 1,000 adults at a large medical center...
A new screening test for COVID-19 was administered to 1,000 adults at a large medical center in Texas. The results showed that 152 out of 160 diagnosed cases of COVID-19 were correctly identified by the screening test. Of the 840 individuals without COVID-19, the screening test correctly identified 714. Based upon this information: 1. Calculate the test's sensitivity, specificity, and the positive and negative predictive values. 2. Calculate the prevalence rate of COVID-19 in this population and the accuracy of...
You work at a screening center that can process 1,000 people per week. Assume you are...
You work at a screening center that can process 1,000 people per week. Assume you are attempting the early detection of a disease with a prevalence of 2% and that your test has a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 90%. Key facts: - 1,000 tests per week - Early detection - 2% prevalence - 95% sensitivity - 90% specificity 13. Complete the following 2 x 2 table (4 points): Gold Standard Present Absent Total Test result Positive a...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT