Question

Community health workers were conducting a screening test for diabetes. People who tested positive on the...

Community health workers were conducting a screening test for diabetes. People who tested positive on the screening test were referred for follow-up testing to confirm if they had diabetes. There were 300 people who tested positive during the screening in the community. Thirty of these people were later found to not have diabetes. There were 500 people who tested negative during the screening in the community. The community health workers later found out that 20 of the people who tested negative during the screening in the community did actually have diabetes.

a. How many false positives were there on the screening test?

b. How many true negatives were there on the screening test?

c. Calculate and interpret the sensitivity of the test. (show your work)

d. Calculate and interpret the specificity of the test. (show your work)

e. Calculate and interpret the positive predictive value of the test. (show your work)

f. Calculate and interpret the negative predictive value of the test. (show your work)

Homework Answers

Answer #1

A. 30 people are found false positive.

B. 20 people are found false negative.

For more clarity am assuming:

A as True positive = 270.

B as  False positive= 30.

C as False Negative = 20.

D as True Negative = 480.

C. Sensitivity: A/(A+C) × 100.

= 270/(270+20)*100 = 93.10 %


D. Specificity: D/(D+B) × 100.

= 480/(480+30)*100 = 94.11 %.


E. Positive Predictive Value: A/(A+B) × 100.

= 270/(270+30)*100 = 90 %

F. Negative Predictive Value: D/(D+C) × 100.

= 480/(480+20) = 96%.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Table 1 below shows results obtained in a new screening test for diabetes. 10,000 people were...
Table 1 below shows results obtained in a new screening test for diabetes. 10,000 people were screened. The cut-off level employed was 180mg of blood glucose per 100 ml. Everyone scoring above this level was classified as positive for diabetes. Everyone scoring below this level was classified as negative for diabetes. These results were compared to a “gold standard” test for diabetes that is considered to be completely valid. Compute and interpret the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and...
A) Sequential screening is performed to reduce the number of false-positives whereby persons who test positive...
A) Sequential screening is performed to reduce the number of false-positives whereby persons who test positive on the first screening test are re-tested a second time. A county-level screening program was implemented whereby 1000 persons were tested for a viral disease in sequence using the same test. The prevalence of the viral disease at the county-level is 15%. The test has a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 95%. Calculate the PPV (positive predictive value) of persons who undergo both...
A screening test applied to 1500 subjects identified 250 of them as positive. On further investigation,...
A screening test applied to 1500 subjects identified 250 of them as positive. On further investigation, 110 of these were found to have the disease being tested for. In subsequent follow-up, 20 of the subjects who tested negative developed the disease within a reasonably short time. Calculate the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of the test. Explain in words what a test specificity of 75% means? Would you recommend using this screening test? Explain your answer.
1. Twenty -four percent of those with diagnosed diabetes tested negative on a screening test for...
1. Twenty -four percent of those with diagnosed diabetes tested negative on a screening test for the disease. This type of screening measure is known as: a. False negative rate b. True positive rate c. False positive rate d. Negative predictive value
The following are data from a Primary Care Practice (PCP) who sees 80% people who are...
The following are data from a Primary Care Practice (PCP) who sees 80% people who are on Medicare. In 2019, the PCP saw 6,000 individuals for 18,322 visits. Since the population the practice sees is over 65, they regularly screen for diabetes every year. Prior to 2019, 10% of the patients had tested positive to diabetes. In 2019, the practice screened people for diabetes and found that 20% screened positive. Of those who screened positive, 80% were confirmed to have...
You work at a screening center that can process 1,000 people per week. Assume you are...
You work at a screening center that can process 1,000 people per week. Assume you are attempting the early detection of a disease with a prevalence of 2% and that your test has a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 90%. Key facts: - 1,000 tests per week - Early detection - 2% prevalence - 95% sensitivity - 90% specificity 13. Complete the following 2 x 2 table (4 points): Gold Standard Present Absent Total Test result Positive a...
The following are data from a Primary Care Practice (PCP) who sees 80% people who are...
The following are data from a Primary Care Practice (PCP) who sees 80% people who are on Medicare. In 2019, the PCP saw 6,000 individuals for 18,322 visits. Since the population the practice sees is over 65, they regularly screen for diabetes every year. Prior to 2019, 10% of the patients had tested positive to diabetes. In 2019, the practice screened people for diabetes and found that 20% screened positive. Of those who screened positive, 80% were confirmed to have...
Suppose that a medical test run on 372 people resulted in 38 positive results. Of those,...
Suppose that a medical test run on 372 people resulted in 38 positive results. Of those, 22 people were eventually confirmed to have the illness. Among the people who tested negative, 3 were eventually diagnosed through other means, and the rest were healthy. Find the sensitivity of the test, the specificity of the test, and the positive and negative predictive values. The positive predictive value is the probability that a person is ill given that they tested positive, and the...
A screening test for a newly discovered disease is being evaluated. In order to determine the...
A screening test for a newly discovered disease is being evaluated. In order to determine the effectiveness of the new test, it was administered to 900 workers. 150 of the individuals diagnosed with the disease tested positive. A negative test finding occurred in 60 people who had the disease. A total of 50 persons not diseased tested positive for it. Assume the prior probability is not known. What was the sensitivity of the test? What was the specificity of the...
You will be assessing the appropriateness of a new screening test for Disease X. Assume a...
You will be assessing the appropriateness of a new screening test for Disease X. Assume a population of 1000 people of whom 100 have Disease X and 900 do not have Disease X to answer questions a through i using the following 2x2 table: Disease No Disease Positive screen 80 100 Negative screen 20 800 1.      Calculate the sensitivity. 2.      Interpret your sensitivity calculation and the implications for potential use of this screening test. 3.       Calculate the specificity. 4.      Interpret your specificity calculation and...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT