One year, the mean age of an inmate on death row was 40.5 years. A sociologist wondered whether the mean age of a death-row inmate has changed since then. She randomly selects 32 death-row inmates and finds that their mean age is 39.5, with a standard deviation of 8.6. Construct a 95% confidence interval about the mean age. What does the interval imply? LOADING... Click the icon to view the table of critical t-values. Choose the correct hypotheses.
Upper H 0: ▼ sigma x over bar mu p ▼ less than not equals greater than equals nothing
Upper H 1: ▼ sigma mu p x over bar ▼ greater than not equals less than equals nothing
(Type integers or decimals. Do not round.)
Construct a 95% confidence interval about the mean age. The lower bound is nothing. The upper bound is nothing.
(Round to two decimal places as needed.) What does the interval imply?
A. Since the mean age from the earlier year is not contained in the interval, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean age had changed
B. Since the mean age from the earlier year is contained in the interval, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean age had changed.
C. Since the mean age from the earlier year is not contained in the interval, there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean age had changed.
D. Since the mean age from the earlier year is contained in the interval, there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean age had changed.
x̅ = 39.5
s = 8.6
n = 32
Null and Alternative hypothesis:
Ho : µ = 40.5
H1 : µ ≠ 40.5
95% Confidence interval :
At α = 0.05 and df = n-1 = 31, two tailed critical value, t-crit = T.INV.2T(0.05, 31) = 2.040
Lower Bound = x̅ - t-crit*s/√n = 39.5 - 2.04 * 8.6/√32 = 36.40
Upper Bound = x̅ + t-crit*s/√n = 39.5 + 2.04 * 8.6/√32 = 42.60
36.40 < µ < 42.60
Answer : D. Since the mean age from the earlier year is
contained in the interval, there is not sufficient evidence to
conclude that the mean age had changed.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.