Question

Subject is PHILOSOPHY

Epicurus: What does it mean that “death is nothing to us”? Why does Epicurus think that we should not

fear death? [Be able to produce his argument for this.]

Mackie: What are the two stages into which Mackie divides Aquinas’ Argument from Contingency (i.e.,

the Third Way)? What are the various objections to these two stages?

Gaunilo: What are Gaunilo’s arguments against Anselm’s proof for God’s existence? Why does Gaunilo

think that God cannot be conceived? How is this a criticism of Anselm’s argument? What is Gaunilo trying

to demonstrate with his illustration of the ‘Lost Island’? How is this a criticism of Anselm’s argument?

Answer 1

On saying "death is nothing to us", Epicurus suggests that wise men, who he refers to as us, do not fear death. This is based on Epicureanism, or atomic materialism. According to this, hell and heaven are not to be feared for they become void after death. This is concluded from the idea that the soul is material, and is destroyed by death. Therefore death is not painful experience for wise men, men who know, because suffering exists in the soul and without soul, suffering becomes nil.