Question

Please read through the article below and answer the question at the end of the article....

Please read through the article below and answer the question at the end of the article.

High-Performing Teams Need Psychological Safety. Here’s How to Create It

“There’s no team without trust,” says Paul Santagata, Head of Industry at Google. He knows the results of the tech giant’s massive two-year study on team performance, which revealed that the highest-performing teams have one thing in common: psychological safety, the belief that you won’t be punished when you make a mistake. Studies show that psychological safety allows for moderate risk-taking, speaking your mind, creativity, and sticking your neck out without fear of having it cut off — just the types of behavior that lead to market breakthroughs.

Ancient evolutionary adaptations explain why psychological safety is both fragile and vital to success in uncertain, interdependent environments. The brain processes a provocation by a boss, competitive coworker, or dismissive subordinate as a life-or-death threat. The amygdala, the alarm bell in the brain, ignites the fight-or-flight response, hijacking higher brain centers. This “act first, think later” brain structure shuts down perspective and analytical reasoning. Quite literally, just when we need it most, we lose our minds. While that fight-or-flight reaction may save us in life-or-death situations, it handicaps the strategic thinking needed in today’s workplace.

Twenty-first-century success depends on another system — the broaden-and-build mode of positive emotion, which allows us to solve complex problems and foster cooperative relationships. Barbara Fredrickson at the University of North Carolina has found that positive emotions like trust, curiosity, confidence, and inspiration broaden the mind and help us build psychological, social, and physical resources. We become more open-minded, resilient, motivated, and persistent when we feel safe. Humor increases, as does solution-finding and divergent thinking — the cognitive process underlying creativity.

When the workplace feels challenging but not threatening, teams can sustain the broaden-and-build mode. Oxytocin levels in our brains rise, eliciting trust and trust-making behavior. This is a huge factor in team success, as Santagata attests: “In Google’s fast-paced, highly demanding environment, our success hinges on the ability to take risks and be vulnerable in front of peers.”

So how can you increase psychological safety on your own team? Try replicating the steps that Santagata took with his:

1. Approach conflict as a collaborator, not an adversary. We humans hate losing even more than we love winning. A perceived loss triggers attempts to reestablish fairness through competition, criticism, or disengagement, which is a form of workplace-learned helplessness. Santagata knows that true success is a win-win outcome, so when conflicts come up, he avoids triggering a fight-or-flight reaction by asking, “How could we achieve a mutually desirable outcome?”

2. Speak human to human. Underlying every team’s who-did-what confrontation are universal needs such as respect, competence, social status, and autonomy. Recognizing these deeper needs naturally elicits trust and promotes positive language and behaviors. Santagata reminded his team that even in the most contentious negotiations, the other party is just like them and aims to walk away happy. He led them through a reflection called “Just Like Me,” which asks you to consider:

This person has beliefs, perspectives, and opinions, just like me.

This person has hopes, anxieties, and vulnerabilities, just like me.

This person has friends, family, and perhaps children who love them, just like me.

This person wants to feel respected, appreciated, and competent, just like me.

This person wishes for peace, joy, and happiness, just like me.

3. Anticipate reactions and plan countermoves. “Thinking through in advance how your audience will react to your messaging helps ensure your content will be heard, versus your audience hearing an attack on their identity or ego,” explains Santagata.

Skillfully confront difficult conversations head-on by preparing for likely reactions. For example, you may need to gather concrete evidence to counter defensiveness when discussing hot-button issues. Santagata asks himself, “If I position my point in this manner, what are the possible objections, and how would I respond to those counterarguments?” He says, “Looking at the discussion from this third-party perspective exposes weaknesses in my positions and encourages me to rethink my argument.”

Specifically, he asks:

What are my main points?

What are three ways my listeners are likely to respond?

How will I respond to each of those scenarios?

4. Replace blame with curiosity. If team members sense that you’re trying to blame them for something, you become their saber-toothed tiger. John Gottman’s research at the University of Washington shows that blame and criticism reliably escalate conflict, leading to defensiveness and — eventually — to disengagement. The alternative to blame is curiosity. If you believe you already know what the other person is thinking, then you’re not ready to have a conversation. Instead, adopt a learning mindset, knowing you don’t have all the facts. Here’s how:

State the problematic behavior or outcome as an observation, and use factual, neutral language. For example, “In the past two months there’s been a noticeable drop in your participation during meetings and progress appears to be slowing on your project.”

Engage them in an exploration. For example, “I imagine there are multiple factors at play. Perhaps we could uncover what they are together?”

Ask for solutions. The people who are responsible for creating a problem often hold the keys to solving it. That’s why a positive outcome typically depends on their input and buy-in. Ask directly, “What do you think needs to happen here?” Or, “What would be your ideal scenario?” Another question leading to solutions is: “How could I support you?”

5. Ask for feedback on delivery. Asking for feedback on how you delivered your message disarms your opponent, illuminates blind spots in communication skills, and models fallibility, which increases trust in leaders. Santagata closes difficult conversations with these questions:

What worked and what didn’t work in my delivery?

How did it feel to hear this message?

How could I have presented it more effectively?

For example, Santagata asked about his delivery after giving his senior manager tough feedback. His manager replied, “This could have felt like a punch in the stomach, but you presented reasonable evidence and that made me want to hear more. You were also eager to discuss the challenges I had, which led to solutions.”

6. Measure psychological safety. Santagata periodically asks his team how safe they feel and what could enhance their feeling of safety. In addition, his team routinely takes surveys on psychological safety and other team dynamics. Some teams at Google include questions such as, “How confident are you that you won’t receive retaliation or criticism if you admit an error or make a mistake?”

If you create this sense of psychological safety on your own team starting now, you can expect to see higher levels of engagement, increased motivation to tackle difficult problems, more learning and development opportunities, and better performance.

QUESTION:

Have you been a part of a High Performing Team in the past? Have you witnessed a High Performing Team in Action? What if any benefits from that team did you see from a sense of Psychological Safety? If you have not ... what benefits do you think you would get from having that level of safety on a team? Do you think that is enough to elevate a mid-level team to High? What other things does Psychological Safety bring to a team? Or just talk about the article. Answer in 2 - 3 paragraphs.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

I have been part of a high performing team in my previous organization. In my previous organization, work tasks were allocated based on the strengths and interests of the employees. So all employees played to their strengths and performed quite well. When an employee is given work which suits his temperament and work style, the employees tends to remain interested in the work and do it in perfection. So the employee remains highly motivated and satisfied with his work in the company.

Psychological safety is the workplace belief which encourages teams to take risks. Any kind of interpersonal risk taking is considered protected and secure in a workplace having psychological safety. The high performing teams require assurance of psychological safety to take appropriate risks and fare well in business. When the team members have an understanding that there will be no impact on their jobs of the outcome of the risk, they are assured to perform well. The job security is assured by psychological safety and widens the horizon over which an employee can work freely.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Read the case below and answer the questions at the end. Several severe accidents have recently...
Read the case below and answer the questions at the end. Several severe accidents have recently occurred in the 12 employee boiler room of City Foundry. James Worth, the boiler room supervisor, is quite upset about the situation. Just yesterday, the Foundry Plant Manager called: Plant Manager: James, what in the world is going on down there? Are you trying to put us out of business? James: If I've lectured these people about safety once, I've done it 50 times....
Please read the article below, and answer the questions that follow. In doing so, remember the...
Please read the article below, and answer the questions that follow. In doing so, remember the following, - Although the use of generic theories, covered in class/your module guide/text book will provide a framework, the expectation for the student is to be able to discuss it in context with research relevant to South Africa and your own reflective experiences. - You are required to extensively research current South African trends, amidst our changing political landscape and benchmarked against a global...
Read the Following Case Study and Answer the Question Below Mandy L. Georgia I live near...
Read the Following Case Study and Answer the Question Below Mandy L. Georgia I live near a major highway on a mini-farm with chickens, ducks and goats. I have a domestic partner and two wonderful sons. I now love to sit on my porch, watching the chickens peck the ground and enjoying the sunshine. But, not too long ago, I used to sit on this same porch and think how easy it would be to walk into traffic. I suffer...
Read the following case and answer the questions that follow. Can employees really manage themselves? At...
Read the following case and answer the questions that follow. Can employees really manage themselves? At W.L. Gore and Associates, self-managed teams have helped create a thriving business that has operated profitably for more than 50 years. Gore is a manufacturer that develops innovative solutions for demanding environments. Focusing primarily on protective fabrics, Gore products might be found in clothing worn on a hike up Mt. Everest or in medical implants for the human body. You may have encountered their...
A consultant hired by your organization has advised your manager to increase his team’s cohesiveness. He...
A consultant hired by your organization has advised your manager to increase his team’s cohesiveness. He asks you, “What benefits would greater cohesiveness have that would make it worth the effort?” How do you respond? Check all that apply. Teams with high cohesiveness are generally more productive due to the energizing effect of regular interaction among team members. Teams with high cohesiveness tend to have some high-performing members but also a high number of free riders. Members of teams with...
Read the case provided below and answer the questions. Managers encourage your team to take time...
Read the case provided below and answer the questions. Managers encourage your team to take time off. “I’m going nowhere fast.” This was the concern one of my clients recently. Her complaint wasn’t about working in quarantine per se, but about her frantic pace and static productivity. With the initial adrenaline rush of the crisis passed, vast numbers of my clients are reporting that they and their teams feel exhausted to the point of being useless, work demands are on...
PLEASE READ THE WHOLE THING AND ANSWER IN DETAIL Consider figure the discussion on Erikson’s theory....
PLEASE READ THE WHOLE THING AND ANSWER IN DETAIL Consider figure the discussion on Erikson’s theory. Erikson’s idea is that we move through several stages throughout life, each characterized by a unique social issue. If we negotiate a particular stage in a healthy way, we will enter the next stage better prepared to do well during that stage. If not, we will enter the next stage with a real disadvantage. I want to tell you of an episode in my...
Using the the Five Practices of Exemplary Leadership, reflect on the leadership definition noted below; “My...
Using the the Five Practices of Exemplary Leadership, reflect on the leadership definition noted below; “My definition of leadership as it stands today is to establish strategies and plans that will organize, develop and lead the team to reach our business goals. Based on my current experience the following areas are my primary focus for my team members; making sure they understand their value, recognition, one on one communication, how we connect to the company strategy, team building, and personal...
Read the case and answer the following Multiple choice questions. There are 5 questions total, where...
Read the case and answer the following Multiple choice questions. There are 5 questions total, where some of them might have more than one correct answers. You can choose more than one options where you think is suitable for the above question. PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Project Manager Oliver Caine skimmed his notes as he waited for Ben Robins to come to the meeting room. He hoped Ben would arrive soon, as he wanted to get the con-versation finished quickly. Ben walked...
Read the following Internal Audit Section of LDC Cloud Sytems Case study and answer the question:...
Read the following Internal Audit Section of LDC Cloud Sytems Case study and answer the question: INTERNAL AUDIT CFO Arizmendi had hired Scott Tensar during the run-up to the IPO for the purpose of creating and heading the internal audit function, and Tensar had continued to report directly to Arizmendi since that time, with a secondary reporting relationship to the board’s audit committee. Tensar, who was well-qualified for the position, was responsible for providing assurance that LDC’s major risks were...