Question

Kansas v. Hendricks (1997) was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court Case that resulted in a major...

Kansas v. Hendricks (1997) was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court Case that resulted in a major ruling.?

a. What did SCOTUS rule?

b. What rationales did SCOTUS provide for the constitutionality of the ruling?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

a. The Supreme Court of United States (SCOTUS) in Kansas v. Hendricks (1997), rule upheld the state statute of "civil commitment" of such individuals who are sexually violent and pose threat to the society due to this uncontrollable behaviors of their, upon completion of their incarceration indefinitely until they are certified by authority by competent authority that the defendant is no longer a "sexually violent predator".

b. The SCOTUS provided rationals that it is necessary to have some restrictions on behaviors of individuals who can't control their dangerous sexual behaviors, thus, it was not unconsititutional double jeopardy or ex- post facto law, as it does not establish criminal proceedings. Hence, involuntary confinement under it should not be considered as punishment.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Based on Grudzinskas & Henry (1997), case: c. What did SCOTUS rule? d. What rationales did...
Based on Grudzinskas & Henry (1997), case: c. What did SCOTUS rule? d. What rationales did SCOTUS provide for the constitutionality of the ruling?
Why was the landmark Supreme Court case Lawrence v. Texas so important? Add in text citation...
Why was the landmark Supreme Court case Lawrence v. Texas so important? Add in text citation and reference
Discuss the impact of McCulloch v. Maryland on American Federalism. How has this landmark Supreme Court...
Discuss the impact of McCulloch v. Maryland on American Federalism. How has this landmark Supreme Court case helped to define the relationship between the national and state government?   
Imagine that you are a Supreme Court justice deciding the Dred Scott v. Sanford case. Explain...
Imagine that you are a Supreme Court justice deciding the Dred Scott v. Sanford case. Explain why you would rule in favor of Sanford.
True or False: Miranda v. Arizona was a 1926 United States Supreme Court case.
True or False: Miranda v. Arizona was a 1926 United States Supreme Court case.
In 1915, the Supreme Court ruled that movies were not protected by the First Amendment; that...
In 1915, the Supreme Court ruled that movies were not protected by the First Amendment; that they were acts of commerce and not speech because they were shipped across state lines for the purpose of doing business. So, from 1915 to 1952 (when the Supreme Court reversed itself and extend First Amendment protection to movies), movies were not covered by the First Amendment. Why did the Court make that ruling? A. Because the movie industry was just developing, the Court...
Discuss the Arizona Supreme Court case of Simat Corp v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System.
Discuss the Arizona Supreme Court case of Simat Corp v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System.
Miranda v. Arizona is a very well know U.S. Supreme Court decision. Who does this decision...
Miranda v. Arizona is a very well know U.S. Supreme Court decision. Who does this decision protect? How is law enforcement affected by this decision?
Consider the decision by the US Supreme Court concerning any recent major case that interests you....
Consider the decision by the US Supreme Court concerning any recent major case that interests you. It could be anything from gay marriage, to voter rights, to immigration. Briefly discuss the pros and cons of the case and give your own opinion of the court's decision.
This term the U.S. Supreme Court will likely rule on a case regarding gerrymandering. Every 10...
This term the U.S. Supreme Court will likely rule on a case regarding gerrymandering. Every 10 years, legislative districts are redrawn based on Census data. In most states, the redrawing of legislative districts is left to the party that controls the state legislature.  Partisan gerrymandering is the practice of drawing legislative and congressional district lines to maximize and perpetuate the power of an incumbent political party. Should legislative districts be drawn using an independent board rather than the political party that...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT