Question

Why was the landmark Supreme Court case Lawrence v. Texas so important? Add in text citation...

Why was the landmark Supreme Court case Lawrence v. Texas so important?

Add in text citation and reference

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Why was the landmark Supreme Court case Lawrence v. Texas so important?

This was the case that set it free for every American to have his freedom of marriage. This was an important case, since two men John Lawrence and Tyron garner, had been arrested under “homos-exual conduct law”. This case put forward the fact that it is the fundamental right of every citizen to be married. This case ensured that all individuals should be protected and every individual has the equality, liberty as well as right to human dignity. This case made it clear that even homose-xual individuals have equal rights of marriage and intimacy and that is their personal choice and their decision.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Discuss the impact of McCulloch v. Maryland on American Federalism. How has this landmark Supreme Court...
Discuss the impact of McCulloch v. Maryland on American Federalism. How has this landmark Supreme Court case helped to define the relationship between the national and state government?   
True or False: Miranda v. Arizona was a 1926 United States Supreme Court case.
True or False: Miranda v. Arizona was a 1926 United States Supreme Court case.
LAW In the landmark case of Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States, Congress established the...
LAW In the landmark case of Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States, Congress established the right to regulate business within a state (“intrastate commerce”) if it affects interstate commerce. why this case is important to travelers. Why is it important?
Discuss the Arizona Supreme Court case of Simat Corp v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System.
Discuss the Arizona Supreme Court case of Simat Corp v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System.
In the case of Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission, the Supreme Court ruled that        Individuals,...
In the case of Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission, the Supreme Court ruled that        Individuals, but not unions and corporations, could spend unlimited money on federal elections        Individual campaign contributions were limited to $50        Unions and corporations could spend unlimited money from their general treasuries on federal elections        Political Action committees could spend unlimited money on Federal elections
16. The New Jersey Supreme Court decided, in the case of A.P. Smith Manufacturing v. Barlow,...
16. The New Jersey Supreme Court decided, in the case of A.P. Smith Manufacturing v. Barlow, the legal question of: A. Whether corporations could give to charity. B. Whether corporations could give paid vacation time to employees. C. Whether employees of corporations could give to charity. D. Whether employees of corporations were entitled to paid vacation time.
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part of a legal argument. When reviewing this case, the Supreme Court used the phrase "two or three standard deviations" as a criterion for statistical significance. This Supreme Court review has served as the basis for many subsequent applications of statistical methods in legal settings. (The two or three standard deviations referred to by the Court are values of the z statistic and correspond to...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part of a legal argument. When reviewing this case, the Supreme Court used the phrase "two or three standard deviations" as a criterion for statistical significance. This Supreme Court review has served as the basis for many subsequent applications of statistical methods in legal settings. (The two or three standard deviations referred to by the Court are values of the z statistic and correspond to...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part of a legal argument. When reviewing this case, the Supreme Court used the phrase "two or three standard deviations" as a criterion for statistical significance. This Supreme Court review has served as the basis for many subsequent applications of statistical methods in legal settings. (The two or three standard deviations referred to by the Court are values of the z statistic and correspond to...
The United States Supreme Court will grant a writ of certiorari in a tax case if:...
The United States Supreme Court will grant a writ of certiorari in a tax case if: a. it involves tax issues of significant importance involving existing law, but which require interpretation. b. it involves a provision of the of tax law which has been the subject of conflicting interpretation by the Circuit Courts of Appeal. c. Both a and b. d. Neither a nor b. 39. The citation, Kean v. Comm'r, 407 F.3d 186 (CA3, 2005), 2005-1 USTC ¶50,397, indicates...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT