How would one feel about the article titled The Fallacy of the "Hijacked Brain" by Peg O'Connor, through the eyes of the categorical imperative theory?
The categorical theory applies only to rational agents. It would not apply to non-humans or to humans who are not rational, e.g., humans with brain malfunctioning, illness or persistent vegetative coma. According to the "hijacked brain" model, the brain can be considered as an innocent victim that operates under the influence of external forces and therefore has no free will. In this sense, individuals cannot be held morally accountable for their actions because they cannot behave as rational agents capable of independent thought, according to the categorical imperative theory.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.