Question

How do think Law Enforcement feel about their case being overturned because on many occasions the...

How do think Law Enforcement feel about their case being overturned because on many occasions the officer is the witness testifying.

Social-Sciences   Psychology   
0 0
Add a commentTranscribed image text
Next >

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Police officers are supposed to treat everyone equally and not to take sides when they treat people or when they testify in a trial. The court considers the testimony of the police officers seriously. Police officers are also human beings and they will also at times make mistakes because of their family situation, financial hardships, emotional outbursts etc. At times the chances are there that the police officers may take sides because they might the relation to the one trialled, they might have been bribed and they might have been threatened. So, on this ground, the court might fear that the case might be overturned by the officials.

0 0
Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Log In

Sign Up

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
How do you feel about the racial minority group being excluded from the "melting pot", and...
How do you feel about the racial minority group being excluded from the "melting pot", and do you think it was fair?
how do legal definitions of adulthood matter in professions such ad law enforcement and health care?
how do legal definitions of adulthood matter in professions such ad law enforcement and health care?
1. Do you think that the inmates have the right to be upset about being denied...
1. Do you think that the inmates have the right to be upset about being denied parole; seeing how they are in prison for breaking the law in the first place? 2. Do you truly think the parole board reads the appeals or do you think they just send out the standard letter?
What do you think about R&D being deducted from revenue? (hint: think about accounting, how do...
What do you think about R&D being deducted from revenue? (hint: think about accounting, how do accountants try to match expenses with revenue? Does the deduction of R&D adhere to the general rule of matching expenses and revenue)?
Who are you? How do you feel about being the person the way you are? (Keywords:...
Who are you? How do you feel about being the person the way you are? (Keywords: profile/personal characteristics, physical, cognitive, socio-emotional developments – personality, values, fitrah and potentials etc). Describe your strengths and weaknesses.
Who are you? How do you feel about being the person the way you are? (Keywords:...
Who are you? How do you feel about being the person the way you are? (Keywords: profile/personal characteristics, physical, cognitive, socio-emotional developments – personality, values, fitrah and potentials etc). Describe your strengths and weaknesses.
Think about a time or an incident that caused you to feel pain (you do not...
Think about a time or an incident that caused you to feel pain (you do not need to share the specific incident or any details). How do you understand that experience differently now that you've read about what pain is and how it is measured? Using what you learned, describe the components of pain you experienced.
Why do you think many people might be skeptical about psychology being a science? -Please write...
Why do you think many people might be skeptical about psychology being a science? -Please write the answer by keyboard not scanning from the paper and thanks a lot!
How do you feel about being the person the way you are? (Keywords: profile/personal characteristics, physical,...
How do you feel about being the person the way you are? (Keywords: profile/personal characteristics, physical, cognitive, socio-emotional developments – personality, values, fitrah and potentials etc). Describe your strengths and weaknesses.
How do you think jurors respond to “battles of the experts” when there are multiple expert...
How do you think jurors respond to “battles of the experts” when there are multiple expert witnesses, reaching different opinions on the basis of essentially the same information, and testifying for different sides?    How can/should jurors make sense of the conflicting information to help them resolve the case?
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT