Which of the following is not an argument for strategic consistency?
Strategic change can be expensive. |
||
Strategic changes usually fail in the long run. |
||
Consumer confusion may result from strategic change even then the new strategy represents a better fit with the firm’s resources. |
||
All of the above are arguments for strategic consistency. |
1 points
QUESTION 34
Which of the following is not an organizational resource consideration?
consistency between the firm’s strategies and its structure |
||
position in the industry |
||
emphasis on training and development |
||
All of the above are resource considerations. |
1 points
QUESTION 35
Which of the following is not an organizational resource consideration?
consistency between the firm’s strategies and its structure |
||
consistency among the corporate, business, and functional strategies |
||
consistency between strategies and the mission and goals |
||
All of the above are organizational resource considerations. |
Question 33:
The answer is given below:
All of the above are arguments for strategic consistency.
Strategic consistency can be defined as how a frame strategy works out at a longer period of time. Hence the above arguments like strategic cost, time period and consumer consideration are a part of strategic consistency discussions.
Question 34:
The answer is given below:
All of the above are resource considerations.
While considering allocation of resources an organization looks into its strategies, structure, their brand in the industry and employee development.
Question 35:
The answer is given below:
All of the above are organizational resource considerations.
As mentioned above in order to consider resources allocation an organization looks into its strategies, structure, their brand in the industry, vision, mission and employee development.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.