Question

explain what the Categorical Imperative consists in. Also, explain the downside of the Kant's Categorical Imperative.

explain what the Categorical Imperative consists in.

Also, explain the downside of the Kant's Categorical Imperative.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Answer) Categorical Imperative-

Universally binding.

Consists of universal respect for others based on their status as rational agents.

Immoral actions are irrational.

Two major formulations-

Formulation from universal law of nature-"Act only in accordance with that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it becomes universal law".

Formulation from humanity-Treat others never as a mere means, but always as an and in themselves.

Downside of Kant's categorical imperative-

Conflicting universal claims.

Universal moral systems are unrealistic,nobody actually follows them.

Kantianism allows no exceptions to perfect duties.

Sometimes a single rule is not enough.

Sometimes there is no way to resolve the conflict between rules.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Based on this video, explain what the Categorical Imperative consists in. Also, explain the downside of...
Based on this video, explain what the Categorical Imperative consists in. Also, explain the downside of the Kant's Categorical Imperative.
According to Kant's "principle of autonomy," it is a "categorical imperative" that our acts be in...
According to Kant's "principle of autonomy," it is a "categorical imperative" that our acts be in conformity with those that would be willed by a "good will," that is, a will that a. does not neglect its duty under the positive common law b. is beneficent to the greatest number of people c. is designed by nature to give universal laws to itself and all to rational beings
1. Provide a detailed description of Kant’s 2nd formula of the Categorical Imperative. In your answer...
1. Provide a detailed description of Kant’s 2nd formula of the Categorical Imperative. In your answer you need to define and differentiate between treating someone as an end versus treating someone merely as a means. Which did Kant Prefer? Why? Finally, what is your position on Kant's 2nd formula? You need to provide your reasoning for this portion of your answer. Can anyone help me with this?? Please???
What are the core differences between the notion of "Utility" and the Categorical Imperative? Is it...
What are the core differences between the notion of "Utility" and the Categorical Imperative? Is it more than just consequences vs duty?
According to Kant, a categorical imperative tells us to do something
According to Kant, a categorical imperative tells us to do something
Categorical imperative = universal moral law •Formulation 1: Act only on that maxim you could at...
Categorical imperative = universal moral law •Formulation 1: Act only on that maxim you could at the same time will to become universal law. •Formulation 2: Treat humans always as ends in themselves, never as means only. a) Brainstorm an example of an ethical situation (like Kant’s examples of suicide, failing to keep promises, wasting talents, or neglecting others) b) Explain in your own words how BOTH formulations of the categorical imperative require that you act in one way and...
What is the difference between the first formulation of the Categorical Imperative and the Golden Rule...
What is the difference between the first formulation of the Categorical Imperative and the Golden Rule ('do unto others as you would have them do unto you"; 'treat others the way you want to be treated')? Why, according to Kant, would the Golden Rule insufficient to serve as a rational moral principle of duty?
What is Kant's "humility" according to Langton? What are Kant's things in themselves according to Langton?
What is Kant's "humility" according to Langton? What are Kant's things in themselves according to Langton?
It is sometimes objected (by Utilitarians) that Kant's theory makes unintuitive, absolute prohibitions against certain actions,...
It is sometimes objected (by Utilitarians) that Kant's theory makes unintuitive, absolute prohibitions against certain actions, like torture. It is unituitive to say that, in the face of extreme bad consequences, we must never, say, torture or lie or kill innocent persons. A) Does Kant's theory really have this result? If so, which actions really do end up in this category (or in other words, which maxims does the Categorial Imperative ALWAYS strike down)? B) If this really is Kant's...
What client assessments are imperative for an individual taking corticotropin therapy who is also taking digitalis...
What client assessments are imperative for an individual taking corticotropin therapy who is also taking digitalis and an oral Glucophage?
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT