Incidence and prevalence are commonly used to measure the existence of disease in a population. In what instances would prevalence be a better indicator of disease burden than incidence? When would incidence be a more appropriate measure?
Prevalence measures the burden of disease within the particular
population at a particular time, the number of people get affected
by the disease. incidence shows the number of new cases of a
disease considered as incidence rate. it both together help to
measure the disease occurrence and frequency.
prevalence is useful that reflects the disease burden among the
population, it measures the disease burden across the locations.it
includes life expectance, quality of life, morbidity, and other
indicators, this help for decision making where we need more focus
on research. but incidence focus only on new cases of the disease
with a particular period that is as a risk or incidence rate.
Incidence can be more appropriate to understand the disease causes
that increase the risk factors to promote the incidence.it also
includes susceptible persons in particular locations within the
period of time.it compares the rates among different subgroups and
their exposure. it measures the disease frequency among the two
groups.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.