Microbrain hosts a website that advertises its software products, features upgrades and patches for its existing products, and accepts orders from customers throughout the world. Bertha, who owns and operates Cheapo Vacations, Inc., a travel agency in Wyoming, orders from the website a copy of Microbrain’s Zifty software. Zifty is designed to help businesses obtain the best prices for their products and services. When Zifty is found to have a defect in its calculating program, Microbrain offers a patch on its website to fix the problem. Bertha has already lost profits because of the miscalculating defect, however, and files a suit against Microbrain in a Wyoming state court. Discuss all legal issues (and the answers thereto) contained within this question. Include in your answer a discussion of the relevant case study presentations and your comments thereto, (if applicable).
Some courts upheld jurisdictional tests on a Web page's usability basis. Other courts have concluded that a Web presence is not sufficient to support jurisdiction over a non-resident without more. In general, courts use a "sliding scale" method to determine the exercise of jurisdiction on the basis of communications over the intermediate network. On that scale, the exercise of personal jurisdiction by a court depends on the amount of business transacted over the internet by an individual or firm. A website that accepts customer orders and delivers upgrades and "patches" has a high level of interactivity. There may be a question as to how much business Microbrain transacts with Wyoming residents. If the company is substantial, it is probable the Microbrain will be subject to the jurisdiction of the court.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.