Question

Microsoft provides compensation to executives in the form of a variety of incentive compensation plans, including...

Microsoft provides compensation to executives in the form of a variety of incentive compensation plans, including restricted stock award grants. The following is an excerpt from a disclosure note from Microsoft’s 2015 annual report:

Real World Case 19–1

Restricted stock awards; Microsoft ● LO19–1

Real World Financials

Broaden Your Perspective

Shares ($ in millions)

Weighted Average GrantDate Fair Value

Stock awards: Nonvested balance, beginning of year 259 $ 27.88 Granted 75 42.36 Vested (94) 27.47 Forfeited

   (24) 31.81 Nonvested balance, end of year 216 $32.72

Note 20 Employee Stock and Savings Plans (in part) Stock awards are grants that entitle the holder to shares of common stock as the award vests. Our stock awards generally vest over a five-year period . . . During fiscal year 2015, the following activity occurred under our plans:

Required:

1. What is the “incentive” provided by Microsoft’s restricted stock grants?

2. If all awards are granted, vested, and forfeited evenly throughout the year, what is the compensation expense in fiscal 2015 pertaining to the previous and current stock awards? Explain. Assume forfeited shares were granted evenly throughout the three previous years.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

1. Restricted Stock Award Plan:

Under restricted stock award plan the employer grants stock options, warrants and rights to the company’s key executives under certain conditions. Restricted stock award plans are subjected to certain conditions laid down by the employer at the time of grant. If the conditions in the stock award plan are violated then the restricted stock plans will be forfeited.

Usually restricted stock awards are granted to executives on a set of given conditions which have to be satisfied by the employees like the net income of the company must exceed the previous year’s net income by not less than 20% or the executive must remain with the company till the end of the financial year 2016, or the volume of sales must be increased by 30% compared to the previous year’s sales etc.

Restricted stocks become available to the employees under a period of graded vesting schedule which lasts for several years. After the period of graded vesting the stocks become invalid.

2. Microsoft has awarded restricted stock incentive compensation plan to its executives

Total compensation

= 75 million * $42.36

= $3,177 million

If all the stock awards are granted, vested and forfeited evenly throughout the year

= 259 million * $27.88

= $7,220.90 million

= $7,220.90 / 3

= $2,406.97 million

Compensation expense for each of the 3 year is $2,406.97 million.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Facebook Inc. included the following disclosure note in an annual report: Share-Based Compensation (in part) ....
Facebook Inc. included the following disclosure note in an annual report: Share-Based Compensation (in part) . . . . compensation expense related to these grants is based on the grant date fair value of the RSUs and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the applicable service period. The following table summarizes the activities for our unvested RSUs for the year ended December 31, 2015: Unvested RSUs Number of Shares (in thousands) Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Unvested at...
Friend Connection Inc. included the following disclosure note in an annual report: Share-Based Compensation (in part)...
Friend Connection Inc. included the following disclosure note in an annual report: Share-Based Compensation (in part) . . . compensation expense related to these grants is based on the grant date fair value of the RSUs and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the applicable service period. The following table summarizes the activities for our unvested RSUs for the year ended December 31, 2015: Unvested RSUs Number of Shares (in thousands) Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Unvested at...
Friend Connection Inc. included the following disclosure note in an annual report: Share-Based Compensation (in part)...
Friend Connection Inc. included the following disclosure note in an annual report: Share-Based Compensation (in part) . . . compensation expense related to these grants is based on the grant date fair value of the RSUs and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the applicable service period. The following table summarizes the activities for our unvested RSUs for the year ended December 31, 2015: Unvested RSUs Number of Shares (in thousands) Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Unvested at...
BigTech, Inc. included the following disclosure note in an annual report: Share-Based Compensation (in part) ....
BigTech, Inc. included the following disclosure note in an annual report: Share-Based Compensation (in part) . . . compensation expense related to these grants is based on the grant date fair value of the RSUs and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the applicable service period. The following table summarizes the activities for our unvested RSUs for the year ended December 31, 2017: Number of Shares (in thousands) Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Unvested at December 31, 2016...
Witter House is a calendar-year firm with 380 million common shares outstanding throughout 2018 and 2019....
Witter House is a calendar-year firm with 380 million common shares outstanding throughout 2018 and 2019. As part of its executive compensation plan, at January 1, 2017, the company had issued 35 million executive stock options permitting executives to buy 35 million shares of stock for $10 within the next eight years, but not prior to January 1, 2020. The fair value of the options was estimated on the grant date to be $3 per option. In 2018, Witter House...
What role could the governance of ethics have played if it had been in existence in...
What role could the governance of ethics have played if it had been in existence in the organization? Assess the leadership of Enron from an ethical perspective. THE FALL OF ENRON: A STAKEHOLDER FAILURE Once upon a time, there was a gleaming headquarters office tower in Houston, with a giant tilted "£"' in front, slowly revolving in the Texas sun. The Enron Corporation, which once ranked among the top Fortune 500 companies, collapsed in 2001 under a mountain of debt...
Discuss ethical issues that can be identified in this case and the mode of managing ethics...
Discuss ethical issues that can be identified in this case and the mode of managing ethics Enron finds itself in this case. How would you describe the ethical culture and levels of trust at Enron? Provide reasons for your assessment. THE FALL OF ENRON: A STAKEHOLDER FAILURE Once upon a time, there was a gleaming headquarters office tower in Houston, with a giant tilted "£"' in front, slowly revolving in the Texas sun. The Enron Corporation, which once ranked among...
Using the model proposed by Lafley and Charan, analyze how Apigee was able to drive innovation....
Using the model proposed by Lafley and Charan, analyze how Apigee was able to drive innovation. case:    W17400 APIGEE: PEOPLE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND THE CHALLENGE OF GROWTH Ranjeet Nambudiri, S. Ramnarayan, and Catherine Xavier wrote this case solely to provide material for class discussion. The authors do not intend to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a managerial situation. The authors may have disguised certain names and other identifying information to protect confidentiality. This publication may not be...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT