Question

After an auditing firm signed off on Acme’s financial statements, Acme’s CFO and thehead of its...

  1. After an auditing firm signed off on Acme’s financial statements, Acme’s CFO and thehead of its sales department were indicted for falsely reporting sales and earnings over a three-year period by creating phony invoices on non-existent sales. Acme’s CEO and chairman professed ignorance of the scheme and fired the CFO and head of sales once the scheme became known.
    1. Do you believe these three groups knew of the fraud?

      Acme’s CEO _________________

      Acme’s Board of Directors ______________

      External auditors __________________________

    2. Using a seven-point scale (1=no responsibility; 7=complete responsibility), rate how much responsibility did these parties have to uncover the fraud.

      Acme’s CEO ________________________

      Acme’s Board of Directors _________________

      External auditors __________________

    3. On which side would you support in a lawsuit for professional negligence brought by investors against Acme’s accountants?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

I believe that Acme's CEO, External Auditors and Board of direcotrs were aware of the fraud as the fraud was going on since three years and obivously the top management would be aware of the same and as far as the external auditors are concerned they might not be aware about the fraud in the initial year but later when they came to knew they would be protecting the same from getting revealed because of the threat of losing client and self-review threat.

The following is the scale of responsibility for following persons :

1)Acme'CEO- 7-full responsibility

2)Acme's Board of Directors-7-Full Responsibility

3)External Auditors

In a lawsuit brought for professional negligence, I would support investors.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Unhealthy Accounting at HealthSouth PROBLEM In 1996, key executives of HealthSouth, one of the nation’s largest...
Unhealthy Accounting at HealthSouth PROBLEM In 1996, key executives of HealthSouth, one of the nation’s largest providers of health care services, began a massive fraud that eventually amounted to $2.7 billion. HealthSouth is a textbook case of unbridled greed combined with a lack of corporate governance, which illustrates the difficult situation that auditors face when clients perpetrate a massive, collusive fraud. HealthSouth was founded in 1984 by Richard Scrushy and coworkers at Lifemark, a Houston-based company that owned and managed...
What role could the governance of ethics have played if it had been in existence in...
What role could the governance of ethics have played if it had been in existence in the organization? Assess the leadership of Enron from an ethical perspective. THE FALL OF ENRON: A STAKEHOLDER FAILURE Once upon a time, there was a gleaming headquarters office tower in Houston, with a giant tilted "£"' in front, slowly revolving in the Texas sun. The Enron Corporation, which once ranked among the top Fortune 500 companies, collapsed in 2001 under a mountain of debt...
Discuss ethical issues that can be identified in this case and the mode of managing ethics...
Discuss ethical issues that can be identified in this case and the mode of managing ethics Enron finds itself in this case. How would you describe the ethical culture and levels of trust at Enron? Provide reasons for your assessment. THE FALL OF ENRON: A STAKEHOLDER FAILURE Once upon a time, there was a gleaming headquarters office tower in Houston, with a giant tilted "£"' in front, slowly revolving in the Texas sun. The Enron Corporation, which once ranked among...
During the trial, lawyers for the accused said that the men believed that the accounting decisions...
During the trial, lawyers for the accused said that the men believed that the accounting decisions they made were appropriate at the time, and that the accounting treatment was approved by Nortel’s auditors from Deloitte & Touche. Judge Marrocco accepted these arguments. Marrocco added he was “not satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt” that the trio (i.e., Dunn, Beatty, and Gollogly) had “deliberately misrepresented” financial results. Given the facts of the case, do you believe Judge Marrocco’s decision was justified? Explain....
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT