Question

3. Among 200 persons with negative screening tests for HIV antibody, 140 are negative with HIV...

3. Among 200 persons with negative screening tests for HIV antibody, 140 are negative with HIV virus (POST RATIONALE FOR ANSWER).

A. The most appropriate measure is:

a. sensitivity b. specificity c. predictive value positive d. predictive value negative

B. Estimate the value of this measure and interpret it (POST RATIONALE FOR ANSWER):

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Solution:

A. The most appropriate measure is specificity.

Specificity: The ability of a test to correctly indentify an individual as disease free is known as test specificity. ​​​​

Here, in our question data is given about the number of individuals who have negative HIV virus i.e. number of individuals who are free from disease. Therefore specificity is appropriate measure for the given question.

B. Number of individuals with HIV negative = 140 Total number of individuals = 200

Specificity is 70%.

Interpretation: A test with 70% specificity is interpreted as follows:

If an individual truely is the case of HIV negative (disease free) then there is a 70% probability that screening test will identify the individual as HIV negative (disease free).

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
True Disease Status Positive Negative Positive 25 60 Nagative 200 300 Based on these data, calculate...
True Disease Status Positive Negative Positive 25 60 Nagative 200 300 Based on these data, calculate the test's sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the accuracy of the screening test, respectively. Interpret your findings. Would you recommend that this test be used to screen for COVID19 in general populations, and why or why not? show step-by-step calculations please
You will be assessing the appropriateness of a new screening test for Disease X. Assume a...
You will be assessing the appropriateness of a new screening test for Disease X. Assume a population of 1000 people of whom 100 have Disease X and 900 do not have Disease X to answer questions a through i using the following 2x2 table: Disease No Disease Positive screen 80 100 Negative screen 20 800 1.      Calculate the sensitivity. 2.      Interpret your sensitivity calculation and the implications for potential use of this screening test. 3.       Calculate the specificity. 4.      Interpret your specificity calculation and...
A screening test for a newly discovered disease is being evaluated. In order to determine the...
A screening test for a newly discovered disease is being evaluated. In order to determine the effectiveness of the new test, it was administered to 900 workers. 150 of the individuals diagnosed with the disease tested positive. A negative test finding occurred in 60 people who had the disease. A total of 50 persons not diseased tested positive for it. Assume the prior probability is not known. What was the sensitivity of the test? What was the specificity of the...
Part 1: Diagnostic tests of medical conditions can have several results. 1) The patient has the...
Part 1: Diagnostic tests of medical conditions can have several results. 1) The patient has the condition and the test is positive (+)             2) The patient has the condition and the test is negative (-) – Known as “false negative” 3) The patient doesn’t have the condition and the test is negative (-) 4) The patient doesn’t have the condition and the test is positive (+) – Known as “false positive” Consider the following:         Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) tests...
Community health workers were conducting a screening test for diabetes. People who tested positive on the...
Community health workers were conducting a screening test for diabetes. People who tested positive on the screening test were referred for follow-up testing to confirm if they had diabetes. There were 300 people who tested positive during the screening in the community. Thirty of these people were later found to not have diabetes. There were 500 people who tested negative during the screening in the community. The community health workers later found out that 20 of the people who tested...
Statistics - Diagnostic tests of medical conditions. Rules: Turn in one set of solutions with names...
Statistics - Diagnostic tests of medical conditions. Rules: Turn in one set of solutions with names of all participating students in the group. Graphs should be neat, clean and well-labeled. Explain how you arrived at the conclusions (functions/formulas used in calculations.) “Explanations” and answers should given be given in the form of complete sentences.Since I give partial credit on the projects you should show your work so that some partial credit can be assigned if your answer is incorrect. Part...
1. Twenty -four percent of those with diagnosed diabetes tested negative on a screening test for...
1. Twenty -four percent of those with diagnosed diabetes tested negative on a screening test for the disease. This type of screening measure is known as: a. False negative rate b. True positive rate c. False positive rate d. Negative predictive value
d) Assume that the same screening test is applied to a high-risk population of intravenous drug...
d) Assume that the same screening test is applied to a high-risk population of intravenous drug users, who are at high risk of AIDS. If you had access to 1,000 IV drug users and could obtain permission to test them for HIV antibody status, and if past studies have estimated that 20% of IV drug users are truly HIV positive, what value will you obtain for the positive predictive value (PPV) in this population? Hint: you have to calculate again...
You work at a screening center that can process 1,000 people per week. Assume you are...
You work at a screening center that can process 1,000 people per week. Assume you are attempting the early detection of a disease with a prevalence of 2% and that your test has a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 90%. Key facts: - 1,000 tests per week - Early detection - 2% prevalence - 95% sensitivity - 90% specificity 13. Complete the following 2 x 2 table (4 points): Gold Standard Present Absent Total Test result Positive a...
Suppose that a screening test for breast cancer has 95% sensitivity and 90% specificity. Assume 1%...
Suppose that a screening test for breast cancer has 95% sensitivity and 90% specificity. Assume 1% of the population being screened truly has breast cancer. a. If you really do have breast cancer, what is the probability that the test says you do? b. If you really do not have breast cancer, what is the probability that the test says you do? c. The screening test is applied to a total of 15 people; 5 who really do have cancer...