Stocks A and B have the following probability distributions of
expected future returns:
Probability |
A |
B |
0.1 |
(12 |
%) |
(31 |
%) |
0.1 |
5 |
|
0 |
|
0.6 |
11 |
|
22 |
|
0.1 |
18 |
|
25 |
|
0.1 |
37 |
|
48 |
|
- Calculate the expected rate of return, , for Stock B
( = 11.40%.) Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your
answer to two decimal places.
%
- Calculate the standard deviation of expected returns,
σA, for Stock A (σB = 19.41%.) Do not round
intermediate calculations. Round your answer to two decimal places.
%
Now calculate the coefficient of variation for Stock B. Do not
round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to two decimal
places.
Is it possible that most investors might regard Stock B as being
less risky than Stock A?
- If Stock B is less highly correlated with the market than A,
then it might have a higher beta than Stock A, and hence be more
risky in a portfolio sense.
- If Stock B is more highly correlated with the market than A,
then it might have a higher beta than Stock A, and hence be less
risky in a portfolio sense.
- If Stock B is more highly correlated with the market than A,
then it might have a lower beta than Stock A, and hence be less
risky in a portfolio sense.
- If Stock B is more highly correlated with the market than A,
then it might have the same beta as Stock A, and hence be just as
risky in a portfolio sense.
- If Stock B is less highly correlated with the market than A,
then it might have a lower beta than Stock A, and hence be less
risky in a portfolio sense.
-Select-IIIIIIIVVItem 4
-
Assume the risk-free rate is 1.5%. What are the Sharpe ratios
for Stocks A and B? Do not round intermediate calculations. Round
your answers to four decimal places.
Stock A:
Stock B:
Are these calculations consistent with the information obtained
from the coefficient of variation calculations in Part b?
- In a stand-alone risk sense A is more risky than B. If Stock B
is less highly correlated with the market than A, then it might
have a higher beta than Stock A, and hence be more risky in a
portfolio sense.
- In a stand-alone risk sense A is less risky than B. If Stock B
is more highly correlated with the market than A, then it might
have the same beta as Stock A, and hence be just as risky in a
portfolio sense.
- In a stand-alone risk sense A is less risky than B. If Stock B
is less highly correlated with the market than A, then it might
have a lower beta than Stock A, and hence be less risky in a
portfolio sense.
- In a stand-alone risk sense A is less risky than B. If Stock B
is less highly correlated with the market than A, then it might
have a higher beta than Stock A, and hence be more risky in a
portfolio sense.
- In a stand-alone risk sense A is more risky than B. If Stock B
is less highly correlated with the market than A, then it might
have a lower beta than Stock A, and hence be less risky in a
portfolio sense.
-Select-IIIIIIIVVItem 7