Question

Consider a relation R=" is at least as old as." Does this relation satisfy the three...

Consider a relation R=" is at least as old as." Does this relation satisfy the three axioms if consumer theory?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Yes, the relation 'is at least as old as' satisfies the three axioms that are as follows:

Complete: This means that between two bundles the consumer is capable of fo deciding which one is preferable to others and rank them. Between two bundles, A and B, either A is as old as B or B is as old as A or both (if A=b). Thus, the consumer can always rank based on the relation given.

Reflexive: This means that the bundle is at least as good as itself. Now of course, a bundle A is at least as old as A. so the relation is reflexive.

Transitive: This means that if A is preferred to B and B is preferred to C, we must have A is preferred to C. Now if A is at least as old as B and B is at least as old as C, it follows that A is at least as old as C. Thus, transitivity holds.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Determine which property(s) the following relation R on the set of all integers satisfy(s)? ( a...
Determine which property(s) the following relation R on the set of all integers satisfy(s)? ( a , b ) ∈ R iff a b ≥ 1 .
Consider the relation R= {(1,2),(2,2),(2,3),(3,1),(3,3)}. Is R transitive, not reflexive, symmetric or equivalence relation?
Consider the relation R= {(1,2),(2,2),(2,3),(3,1),(3,3)}. Is R transitive, not reflexive, symmetric or equivalence relation?
Consider the relation R defined on the set R as follows: ∀x, y ∈ R, (x,...
Consider the relation R defined on the set R as follows: ∀x, y ∈ R, (x, y) ∈ R if and only if x + 2 > y. For example, (4, 3) is in R because 4 + 2 = 6, which is greater than 3. (a) Is the relation reflexive? Prove or disprove. (b) Is the relation symmetric? Prove or disprove. (c) Is the relation transitive? Prove or disprove. (d) Is it an equivalence relation? Explain.
Consider the relation R defined on the real line R, and defined as follows: x ∼...
Consider the relation R defined on the real line R, and defined as follows: x ∼ y if and only if the distance from the point x to the point y is less than 3. Study if this relation is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. Which points are related to 2?
Consider the relation on  {1,2,3,4}  defined by  r = { (a, b) : a > b...
Consider the relation on  {1,2,3,4}  defined by  r = { (a, b) : a > b }  and  s = { ( a, b ) : a − b = 1 }.  List all elements of  rs
Does the non-archimedean field R(t) satisfy the Nested Interval Property? Explain. Note that R(t) elements are...
Does the non-archimedean field R(t) satisfy the Nested Interval Property? Explain. Note that R(t) elements are rational functions in the variable t with coefficients in R. We take the ratio of polynomials to create the elements.
For what two values of r does the function y = e rx  satisfy the differential equation...
For what two values of r does the function y = e rx  satisfy the differential equation y′′ − 3y′ − 18y = 0 ?
Find at least three ordered pairs that satisfy the following equation and graph the line through...
Find at least three ordered pairs that satisfy the following equation and graph the line through them. You may use the grid provided or create your own graph. Show all work. -6-5x=2y
A relation R is defined on Z by aRb if |a−b| ≤ 2. Which of the...
A relation R is defined on Z by aRb if |a−b| ≤ 2. Which of the properties reflexive, symmetric and transitive does the relation R possess? Explain why If R does not possess one of these properties,
Problem 57 on page 617 from Rosen) Consider the equivalence relation R = {(x, y)| x-y...
Problem 57 on page 617 from Rosen) Consider the equivalence relation R = {(x, y)| x-y is an integer} a. What is the equivalence class of 1 for this equivalence relations? b. What is the equivalence class of 1/2 for this equivalence relation?