Question

Compare two competing, mutually exclusive new machines that have only cost data given and tell which...

Compare two competing, mutually exclusive new machines that have only cost data given and tell which of the following statements is true regarding the present worth of the incremental investment at your investment interest rate.

a.) If it is greater than zero, we chose the alternative with the largest initial investment expense.

b.) The internal rate of return will always be equal to the investment rate of return.

c.) Neither machine is chosen if there is only cost data and the present worth is less than zero.

d.) If it is less then zero, we chose the alternative with the smallest initial investment expense.

Can you please give an explanation for the answer. Thank you.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Mutually exclusive machines cannot go hand in hand and the occurrence of one will suspend the other one. In this case, both the machines can't be chosen and the incremental investment considering the present worth of the machines is that none of the machines will be chosen if the worth of the machines is less than zero. If the worth of the machines is less than zero, then the investment will not be worthy.

If the interest rate is greater than zero, the alternative with less initial investment expense should be chosen.

The internal rate of return will be higher or lesser than the investment rate of return because the initial rate of return considers only the initial value and final value.

If the interest rate is less than zero, then it is better to choose the alternative with a high initial investment expense.

Answer: Option C

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
You are evaluating 2 machines the investment of 2 mutually exclusive machines. Each machine has an...
You are evaluating 2 machines the investment of 2 mutually exclusive machines. Each machine has an eight year life and you plan to keep whichever machine you pick for the full 8 years. The firm's MARR is 10%. The cash flows for each machine are summarized in the following table: A B Initial Cost $4000 $3000 Annual Benefit $800 $600 Annual Cost $100 $50 Salvage Value $1500 $1000 Each investment has an IRR greater than the 10% MARR. Using Incremental...
You are evaluating 2 machines the investment of 2 mutually exclusive machines. Each machine has an...
You are evaluating 2 machines the investment of 2 mutually exclusive machines. Each machine has an eight year life and you plan to keep whichever machine you pick for the full 8 years. The firm's MARR is 10%. The cash flows for each machine are summarized in the following table: A B Initial Cost $4000 $3000 Annual Benefit $800 $600 Annual Cost $100 $50 Salvage Value $1500 $1000 Each investment has an IRR greater than the 10% MARR. Using Incremental...
You are evaluating 2 machines the investment of 2 mutually exclusive machines. Each machine has an...
You are evaluating 2 machines the investment of 2 mutually exclusive machines. Each machine has an eight year life and you plan to keep whichever machine you pick for the full 8 years. The firm's MARR is 10%. The cash flows for each machine are summarized in the following table: A B Initial Cost $4000 $3000 Annual Benefit $800 $600 Annual Cost $100 $50 Salvage Value $1500 $1000 Each investment has an IRR greater than the 10% MARR. Using Incremental...
The following data have been estimated for two mutually exclusive investment alternatives, A and B. Incremental...
The following data have been estimated for two mutually exclusive investment alternatives, A and B. Incremental ROR analysis was perform to select more desirable alternative. If MARR = 12%, the value of incremental cash flow for year 3 is: A B Capital Investment -8000 -13000 Annual Cash Flow -3500 -1600 Salvage Value 0 2,000 Useful life 5 5 -$1900 +$1900 -$3,500 +$3,500
When the mutually exclusive alternatives under consideration have only disbursements (service alternatives), the do-nothing alternative must...
When the mutually exclusive alternatives under consideration have only disbursements (service alternatives), the do-nothing alternative must be included so that a rate of return analysis can be conducted on the incremental cash flow. Question 1 options: True False
The firm must choose between two mutually exclusive investments each requiring initial outlay of $8000 with...
The firm must choose between two mutually exclusive investments each requiring initial outlay of $8000 with the following net cash flows: Year Investment A Investment B 1 3200 4800 2 2400 3200 3 4800 2400 The firm’s required rate of return is 14% Calculate the payback period and the net present value method for each investment. Which (or both) investment should be chosen?
Two mutually exclusive alternatives are being considered. Both have lives of 5 years. Alternative A has...
Two mutually exclusive alternatives are being considered. Both have lives of 5 years. Alternative A has a first cost of $2500 and annual benefits of $746. Alternative B costs $6000 and has annual benefits of $1664. The minimum attractive rate of return is 8%. (a) What is the incremental rate of return between the two alternatives? (b) Which alternative should be selected? Please explain your response a step by step.
Two mutually exclusive projects have an initial cost of $60,000 each. Project A produces cash inflows...
Two mutually exclusive projects have an initial cost of $60,000 each. Project A produces cash inflows of $30,000, $37,000, and $20,000 for Years 1 through 3, respectively. Project B produces cash inflows of $80,000 in Year 2 only. The required rate of return is 10 percent for Project A and 11 percent for Project B. Which project(s) should be accepted and why? Project A, because it has the higher required rate of return. Project A, because it has the larger...
No Excel. Two mutually exclusive alternatives are bring considered: A and B. Both alternatives cost $1,200...
No Excel. Two mutually exclusive alternatives are bring considered: A and B. Both alternatives cost $1,200 at the present. However, the pattern of revenue from them is different. Alternative A has the potential to bring more revenues later in the project life. The expected revenues of alternative A are: $350, $500, and $850 by the ends of years one to three, respectively. Alternative B promises more immediate cash inflow which is expected to diminish with time: $750, $300, and $100...
6. Understanding the NPV profile If projects are mutually exclusive, only one project can be chosen....
6. Understanding the NPV profile If projects are mutually exclusive, only one project can be chosen. The internal rate of return (IRR) and the net present value (NPV) methods will not always choose the same project. If the crossover rate on the NPV profile is below the horizontal axis, the methods will agree. Projects Y and Z are mutually exclusive projects. Their cash flows and NPV profiles are shown as follows. Year Project Y Project Z 0 –$1,500 –$1,500 1...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT