Question

No Excel. Two mutually exclusive alternatives are bring considered: A and B. Both alternatives cost $1,200...

No Excel.

Two mutually exclusive alternatives are bring considered: A and B. Both alternatives cost $1,200 at the present. However, the pattern of revenue from them is different. Alternative A has the potential to bring more revenues later in the project life. The expected revenues of alternative A are: $350, $500, and $850 by the ends of years one to three, respectively. Alternative B promises more immediate cash inflow which is expected to diminish with time: $750, $300, and $100 by the ends of years one to three, respectively. Use MARR=8%.

1. Calculate the Internal Rate of Return of each alternative.

2. Which alternatives are feasible?

3. Calculate the Net Present Worth of each alternative and compare them.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

1.

IRR is computed using Excel IRR function as follows.

Alternative - A Alternative - B
Year Cash flow ($) Year Cash flow ($)
0 -1,200 0 -1,200
1 350 1 750
2 500 2 300
3 850 3 100
IRR = 16.78% IRR = -2.91%

2.

Since Alternative A has positive IRR than is higher than MRR, Alternative A is feasible and Alternative B is not.

3.

NPW, Alt A ($) = - 1,200 + 350 x P/F(8%, 1) + 500 x P/F(8%, 2) + 850 x P/F(8%, 3)

= - 1,200 + 350 x 0.9259 + 500 x 0.8573 + 850 x 0.7938

= - 1,200 + 324.07 + 428.65 + 674.73

= 227.45

NPW, Alt B ($) = - 1,200 + 750 x P/F(8%, 1) + 300 x P/F(8%, 2) + 100 x P/F(8%, 3)

= - 1,200 + 750 x 0.9259 + 300 x 0.8573 + 100 x 0.7938

= - 1,200 + 694.43 + 257.19 + 79.38

= - 169

Since Alternative A has positive NPW, this is acceptable.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Two mutually exclusive alternatives are being considered. Both have lives of 5 years. Alternative A has...
Two mutually exclusive alternatives are being considered. Both have lives of 5 years. Alternative A has a first cost of $2500 and annual benefits of $746. Alternative B costs $6000 and has annual benefits of $1664. The minimum attractive rate of return is 8%. (a) What is the incremental rate of return between the two alternatives? (b) Which alternative should be selected? Please explain your response a step by step.
The following data have been estimated for two mutually exclusive investment alternatives, A and B. Incremental...
The following data have been estimated for two mutually exclusive investment alternatives, A and B. Incremental ROR analysis was perform to select more desirable alternative. If MARR = 12%, the value of incremental cash flow for year 3 is: A B Capital Investment -8000 -13000 Annual Cash Flow -3500 -1600 Salvage Value 0 2,000 Useful life 5 5 -$1900 +$1900 -$3,500 +$3,500
Consider the following two mutually exclusive alternatives: A B 0 -$18,000 -$21,100 1 $7,500 $6,000 2...
Consider the following two mutually exclusive alternatives: A B 0 -$18,000 -$21,100 1 $7,500 $6,000 2 $7,800 $14,000 3 $6,650 $7,000 Determine the IRR on the incremental investment. If the firm’s MARR is 18%, which alternative is the better choice?
Compare two mutually exclusive alternatives below using annual worth analysis at MARR = 10% per year....
Compare two mutually exclusive alternatives below using annual worth analysis at MARR = 10% per year. Which alternative should be selected? Alternatives Alternative 1 Alternative 2 First cost, $ -90,000 -750,000 Annual cost, $/year -50,000 -10,000 Salvage value, $ 8,000 - Life, years 5 ∞ Alternative 2 and -$85,000 Alternative 1 and -$72,450 Alternative 2 and -$72,450 Alternative 1 and -$65,000
Consider the following mutually exclusive alternatives: Alternative A Alternative B Capital investment Net annual receipts $702,000...
Consider the following mutually exclusive alternatives: Alternative A Alternative B Capital investment Net annual receipts $702,000 $123,550 $1,656,000 $276,200 Both alternatives have a useful life of 12 years and no market value at that time. The MARR is 12 % per year. Determine the annual worth (AW) of the most profitable course of action. (Enter your answer as a number without the dollar sign.)
Consider the three mutually exclusive alternatives below. At the end of their useful lives, Alternatives X...
Consider the three mutually exclusive alternatives below. At the end of their useful lives, Alternatives X and Z will be replaced with identical replacements so that a 10-year service requirement is met. If the MARR is 3% per year, which alternative (if any) should be chosen based on the annual worth method? Alt X Alt Y Alt Z Capital investment $300,000 $425,000. $500,000. Annual savings $68,750 $108,750. $188,750. Salvage value $90,000 $125,000. $140,000. Life, years 10 20 5
Consider four mutually exclusive alternatives, each having an 8-year life: A. B. C. D. First cost:...
Consider four mutually exclusive alternatives, each having an 8-year life: A. B. C. D. First cost: $1000. $800. $600. $500 Uniform annual: 152. 120. 97. 122 Benefit Salvage value: 750. 500. 500 0 If the minimum attractive rate of return is 12%, which alternative should be selected? Use the incremental analysis method
Consider the following two mutually exclusive alternatives for reclaiming a deteriorating​ inner-city neighborhood​ (one of them...
Consider the following two mutually exclusive alternatives for reclaiming a deteriorating​ inner-city neighborhood​ (one of them must be​ chosen). Notice that the IRR for both alternatives is 27.18​%. a. If MARR is 15​% per​ year, which alternative is​ better? b. What is the IRR on the incremental cash flow​ [i.e.,Upper Δ​(Y−X​)]? c. If the MARR is 27.5​% per​ year, which alternative is​ better? d. What is the simple payback period for each​ alternative? EOY x y 0 -$100,000 -$100,000 1...
Consider the following EOY cash flows for two mutually exclusive alternatives​ (one must be​ chosen). The...
Consider the following EOY cash flows for two mutually exclusive alternatives​ (one must be​ chosen). The MARR is 4​% per year. Lead Acid Lithium Ion Capital investment ​$5,000 ​$13,000 Annual expenses ​$2,250 ​$2,500 Useful life 12 years 18 years Market value at end of useful life ​$0 ​$2,600 LOADING... Click the icon to view the interest and annuity table for discrete compounding when i=4​% per year. Determine which alternative should be selected if the repeatability assumption applies. The AW of...
Orpheum Productions in Nevada is considering three mutually exclusive alternatives for lighting enhancements to one of...
Orpheum Productions in Nevada is considering three mutually exclusive alternatives for lighting enhancements to one of its recording studios. Each enhancement will increase revenues by attracting directors who prefer this lighting style. The cash flow details for these enhancements are shown in the table below. The MARR is 10% per year. Based on an internal rate of return analysis, and assuming a do-nothing alternative, which alternative (if any) should be implemented? Please, no excel sheets. End of Year Light Bar...