Question

Two mutually exclusive alternatives are being considered. Both have lives of 5 years. Alternative A has...

Two mutually exclusive alternatives are being considered. Both have lives of 5 years. Alternative A has a first cost of $2500 and annual benefits of $746. Alternative B costs $6000 and has annual benefits of

$1664. The minimum attractive rate of return is 8%.

(a) What is the incremental rate of return between the two alternatives?

(b) Which alternative should be selected?

Please explain your response a step by step.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Answer: A. ROR is the rate at which our NPV becomes 0.

Present value = cash flow/(1+ discount rate) ^(no of years)

Use different discount rate values so that sum of all present values becomes 0, Trial and error method to calculate ROR

You can also use the IRR formula in the excel to directly calculate the ROR value.

Below is the calculation, I have used excel to calculate ROR of the given cash flow

Year A B Difference (B-A)
0 -2500 -6000 -3500
1 746 1664 918
2 746 1664 918
3 746 1664 918
4 746 1664 918
5 746 1664 918
ROR 15% 12% 9.8%

Answer B. The increment rate of return of (B-A) 10% > 8% MARR , therefore higher cost alternative must be selected. which is B.

B project will give us more benefit.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
No Excel. Two mutually exclusive alternatives are bring considered: A and B. Both alternatives cost $1,200...
No Excel. Two mutually exclusive alternatives are bring considered: A and B. Both alternatives cost $1,200 at the present. However, the pattern of revenue from them is different. Alternative A has the potential to bring more revenues later in the project life. The expected revenues of alternative A are: $350, $500, and $850 by the ends of years one to three, respectively. Alternative B promises more immediate cash inflow which is expected to diminish with time: $750, $300, and $100...
Consider four mutually exclusive alternatives, each having an 8-year life: A. B. C. D. First cost:...
Consider four mutually exclusive alternatives, each having an 8-year life: A. B. C. D. First cost: $1000. $800. $600. $500 Uniform annual: 152. 120. 97. 122 Benefit Salvage value: 750. 500. 500 0 If the minimum attractive rate of return is 12%, which alternative should be selected? Use the incremental analysis method
Consider three mutually exclusive alternatives. The MARR is 10%based on the payback period method, which alternative...
Consider three mutually exclusive alternatives. The MARR is 10%based on the payback period method, which alternative should be selected? Year             X           Y           Z 0                   -$100    -$50      -$50 1                   25          16          21 2                   25          16          21 3                   25          16          21 4                   25          16          21 Consider three mutually exclusive alternatives, each with a 20 year life span and no salvage value. The minimum attractive rate of return is 6%. A                         B                           C Initial Cost                                     $4000                 $8000                           $10,000 Uniform Annual Benefit ($)            410                    ...
When the mutually exclusive alternatives under consideration have only disbursements (service alternatives), the do-nothing alternative must...
When the mutually exclusive alternatives under consideration have only disbursements (service alternatives), the do-nothing alternative must be included so that a rate of return analysis can be conducted on the incremental cash flow. Question 1 options: True False
The following data have been estimated for two mutually exclusive investment alternatives, A and B. Incremental...
The following data have been estimated for two mutually exclusive investment alternatives, A and B. Incremental ROR analysis was perform to select more desirable alternative. If MARR = 12%, the value of incremental cash flow for year 3 is: A B Capital Investment -8000 -13000 Annual Cash Flow -3500 -1600 Salvage Value 0 2,000 Useful life 5 5 -$1900 +$1900 -$3,500 +$3,500
Consider the following mutually exclusive alternatives: Alternative A Alternative B Capital investment Net annual receipts $702,000...
Consider the following mutually exclusive alternatives: Alternative A Alternative B Capital investment Net annual receipts $702,000 $123,550 $1,656,000 $276,200 Both alternatives have a useful life of 12 years and no market value at that time. The MARR is 12 % per year. Determine the annual worth (AW) of the most profitable course of action. (Enter your answer as a number without the dollar sign.)
A firm is considering three mutually exclusive alternatives as part of a production improvement program.The alternatives...
A firm is considering three mutually exclusive alternatives as part of a production improvement program.The alternatives are: A   B C Installed cost $10,000 $15,000 $ 20,000 Annual benefit 1625 1530 1890   Useful life (Years) 10 20 20 The salvage value of each alternative is zero.At the end of 10 years Alternative A could be replaced with another A with identical cost and benefits . a)Which alternative should be selected if interest is 6% b)3% c)If there is a difference between...
Two projects being considered are mutually exclusive and have the following cash flows: Year Project A...
Two projects being considered are mutually exclusive and have the following cash flows: Year Project A Project B 0 -$50,000 -$50,000 1    15,000 0 2    15,000 0 3    15,000 0 4    15,000 0 5    15,000 99,000 If the required rate of return on these projects is 10 percent, which would be chosen and why?
Compare two mutually exclusive alternatives below using annual worth analysis at MARR = 10% per year....
Compare two mutually exclusive alternatives below using annual worth analysis at MARR = 10% per year. Which alternative should be selected? Alternatives Alternative 1 Alternative 2 First cost, $ -90,000 -750,000 Annual cost, $/year -50,000 -10,000 Salvage value, $ 8,000 - Life, years 5 ∞ Alternative 2 and -$85,000 Alternative 1 and -$72,450 Alternative 2 and -$72,450 Alternative 1 and -$65,000
Final Finishing is considering three mutually exclusive alternatives for a new polisher. Each alternative has an...
Final Finishing is considering three mutually exclusive alternatives for a new polisher. Each alternative has an expected life of 10 years and no salvage value. Polisher 1 requires an initial investment of $20,000 and provides annual benefits of $4,465. Polisher 2 requires an initial investment of $10,000 and provides annual benefits of $1,770. Polisher 3 requires an initial investment of $15,000 and provides annual benefits of $3,580. MARR is 15%/year. Show the comparisons and internal rates of return used to...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT