Question

suppose a polluting firm is faced with a pollution tax. the firm will choose to abate...




suppose a polluting firm is faced with a pollution tax. the firm will choose to abate pollution so long as the








Homework Answers

Answer #1

The firm will choose to abate pollution as long as the marginal abatement cost is lower than the tax.

Concept:-

The efficient level of abatement is acheived when the marginal benefit equals to the marginal abatement cost, economic point of view the polluting firm will think that it is more cheaper to abate carbon emissions as long as the marginal abatement cost is lower than the pollution tax imposed on them, if the marginal abatement cost is more than the pollution tax, then the firm will choose to pay pollution tax and continue doing emissions.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Inefficient Environmental Policy Consider a city where each polluting firm initially generates two tons of pollution....
Inefficient Environmental Policy Consider a city where each polluting firm initially generates two tons of pollution. Half the polluters (type L} could cut Pack pollution at a cost of $4 per ton, and the other half (type H) could cut Pack at a cost of $30 per ton. The city is considering two alternative environmental policies: i. Pollution tax: Each firm would pay a tax of $5 for each unit of pollution. ii. Uniform-reduction: Each firm would Pe required to...
Consider two polluting firms. The marginal cost of abatement for firm 1 is MC1 = e1...
Consider two polluting firms. The marginal cost of abatement for firm 1 is MC1 = e1 + 300, and the marginal cost of abatement for firm 2 is MC2 = 3e2, where e1 and e2 are the tons of pollution abatement by firms 1 and 2, respectively. Baseline pollution levels are bl1 = 2000 and bl2 = 2000. Suppose the government sets a pollution reduction goal of 1600 total units of abatement. Write down two equations that ensure that the...
19. A large polluting industry that is unlikely to move under the pollution haven hypothesis if...
19. A large polluting industry that is unlikely to move under the pollution haven hypothesis if a large carbon tax is imposed is ___________________________
Suppose there are two firms: Firm A and Firm B. These firms are each emitting 50...
Suppose there are two firms: Firm A and Firm B. These firms are each emitting 50 tons of pollution. Firm A faces marginal abatement cost MACA = 6A and Firm B faces marginal abatement cost MACB = 12A where A is tons of pollution abatement. The government wishes for the total amount of pollution to be 80 tons. 1. (1.5 points) What is the total cost of abatement if the government mandates that Firm A abate 20 tons (such that...
Suppose there are two firms: Firm A and Firm B. These firms are each emitting 50...
Suppose there are two firms: Firm A and Firm B. These firms are each emitting 50 tons of pollution. Firm A faces marginal abatement cost MACA = 6A and Firm B faces marginal abatement cost MACB = 12A where A is tons of pollution abatement. The government wishes for the total amount of pollution to be 80 tons. 1. (2 points) At the cost effective allocation of abatement, how much does Firm A abate? 2. (2 points) What tax per...
QAand QSare the pollution levels for Arrow and Solow Industries, respectively. Profits (benefits) associated with polluting...
QAand QSare the pollution levels for Arrow and Solow Industries, respectively. Profits (benefits) associated with polluting activity, pi(i=A, S), are pA=10QA– 0.5*QA2and ps= 20QS – QS2. Marginal benefits (profits) for each firm are MBA=10 -QA, and MBS=20 -2QS. (c)  (5 points) Someone in the DEQ studied environmental economics and suggests a marketable permit system to achieve the 60% rollback, with each firm given permits representing the level of its emissions in (b). Who (if either) will want to buy permits, and...
Question: Suppose there are two firms and they pollute the environment. Their total abatement cost is...
Question: Suppose there are two firms and they pollute the environment. Their total abatement cost is given... Suppose there are two firms and they pollute the environment. Their total abatement cost is given below.   TC(R1)=1/2(R1)^2, TC(R2)=2/3(R2)^3/2 Suppose the government wants to reduce pollution by 12 units. 1. Find the cost-efficient way to abate 12 units of pollution. How many of these 12 units would Firm 1 abate? 2. Find the cost-efficient way to abate 12 units of pollution. How many...
Suppose there are two firms and they pollute the environment. Their total abatement cost is given...
Suppose there are two firms and they pollute the environment. Their total abatement cost is given below.   TC(R1)=1/2(R1)^2, TC(R2)=2/3(R2)^3/2 Suppose the government wants to reduce pollution by 12 units. 1. Find the cost-efficient way to abate 12 units of pollution. How many of these 12 units would Firm 1 abate? 2. Find the cost-efficient way to abate 12 units of pollution. How many of these 12 units would Firm 2 abate? 3. Choose all the policies below that do not...
Assume there are two polluting firms in two different cities. In the business-as-usual outcome, Firm #1...
Assume there are two polluting firms in two different cities. In the business-as-usual outcome, Firm #1 would emit 20 units of pollution (e1=20) and Firm #2 would emit 20 units of pollution (e2=20). Additionally, assume the marginal abatement costs for Firm #1 and Firm #2 are given below: MAC1 (x1) = 0.5x1    &    MAC2 (x2) = 2x2 This pollutant is known to cause adverse health effects when in high concentrations. Since the firms are in different cities, assume the marginal social benefit...
Suppose that government officials have set an emissions tax to reduce pollution. Assume that the optimal...
Suppose that government officials have set an emissions tax to reduce pollution. Assume that the optimal tax would be $1,500, but government officials have set the tax at $500. At the equilibrium with the $500 tax: a. there will be too much pollution. b. the marginal social cost of pollution will be less than $500. c. the marginal social benefit of pollution will be less than $500. d. the marginal social benefit of pollution will be more than $500.
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT