Question

3. Assume √2 ∈R. Let S = { rational numbers q : q < √2 }....

3. Assume √2 ∈R. Let S = { rational numbers q : q < √2 }. (a)(i) Show that S is nonempty. (ii) Prove that S is bounded from above, but is not bounded from below. (b) Prove that supS = √2.

Homework Answers

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Let S and T be nonempty subsets of R with the following property: s ≤ t...
Let S and T be nonempty subsets of R with the following property: s ≤ t for all s ∈ S and t ∈ T. (a) Show that S is bounded above and T is bounded below. (b) Prove supS ≤ inf T . (c) Given an example of such sets S and T where S ∩ T is nonempty. (d) Give an example of sets S and T where supS = infT and S ∩T is the empty set....
6. Define S={q∈Q:−√3< q <√3}, where Q denotes the rational numbers. Prove that S can not...
6. Define S={q∈Q:−√3< q <√3}, where Q denotes the rational numbers. Prove that S can not be the set of subsequential limits of any sequence (sn) of reals. Please be very verbose. I already have the answer to this question as a contradiction. It is okay if you use a contradiction, however please explain thoroughly.
Question 3. Let a1,...,an ∈R. Prove that (a1 + a2 + ... + an)2 /n ≤...
Question 3. Let a1,...,an ∈R. Prove that (a1 + a2 + ... + an)2 /n ≤ (a1)2 + (a2)2 + ... + (an)2. Question 5. Let S ⊆R and T ⊆R be non-empty. Suppose that s ≤ t for all s ∈ S and t ∈ T. Prove that sup(S) ≤ inf(T). Question 6. Let S ⊆ R and T ⊆ R. Suppose that S is bounded above and T is bounded below. Let U = {t−s|t ∈ T, s...
1. (a) Let S be a nonempty set of real numbers that is bounded above. Prove...
1. (a) Let S be a nonempty set of real numbers that is bounded above. Prove that if u and v are both least upper bounds of S, then u = v. (b) Let a > 0 be a real number. Define S := {1 − a n : n ∈ N}. Prove that if epsilon > 0, then there is an element x ∈ S such that x > 1−epsilon.
Prove that the only ring homomorphism from Q (rational numbers) to Q (rational numbers) is the...
Prove that the only ring homomorphism from Q (rational numbers) to Q (rational numbers) is the identity map.
Let A⊆R be a nonempty set, which is bounded above. Let B={a-5:a∈ A}. Prove that sup(B)=sup(A)-5
Let A⊆R be a nonempty set, which is bounded above. Let B={a-5:a∈ A}. Prove that sup(B)=sup(A)-5
let A be a nonempty subset of R that is bounded below. Prove that inf A...
let A be a nonempty subset of R that is bounded below. Prove that inf A = -sup{-a: a in A}
Let p and q be irrational numbers. Is p−q rational or irrational? Show all proof.
Let p and q be irrational numbers. Is p−q rational or irrational? Show all proof.
Suppose A ⊆ R is nonempty and bounded above and β ∈ R. Let A +...
Suppose A ⊆ R is nonempty and bounded above and β ∈ R. Let A + β = {a + β : a ∈ A} Prove that A + β has a supremum and sup(A + β) = sup(A) + β.
Let p and q be any two distinct prime numbers and define the relation a R...
Let p and q be any two distinct prime numbers and define the relation a R b on integers a,b by: a R b iff b-a is divisible by both p and q. I need to prove that: a) R is an equivalence relation. (which I have) b) The equivalence classes of R correspond to the elements of  ℤpq. That is: [a] = [b] as equivalence classes of R if and only if [a] = [b] as elements of ℤpq I...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT