Case 1 |
Case 2 |
Case 3 |
Case 4 |
Case 5 |
Case 6 |
Case 7 |
Case 8 |
|
IR |
25% |
40% |
60% |
70% |
70% |
70% |
95% |
60% |
CR |
50% |
50% |
60% |
100% |
50% |
70% |
40% |
50% |
AR |
3% |
4% |
5% |
5% |
2% |
1% |
3% |
1% |
DR |
Help with an Audit Risk
Using your excel template, calculate DR.
AR=IR*CR*DR | ||||||||
Therefore DR=AR/(IR*CR) | ||||||||
Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Case 5 | Case 6 | Case 7 | Case 8 | |
IR | 25.0% | 40.0% | 60.0% | 70.0% | 70.0% | 70.0% | 95.0% | 60.0% |
CR | 50.0% | 50.0% | 60.0% | 100.0% | 50.0% | 70.0% | 40.0% | 50.0% |
AR | 3.0% | 4.0% | 5.0% | 5.0% | 2.0% | 1.0% | 3.0% | 1.0% |
DR | 24.0% | 20.0% | 13.9% | 7.1% | 5.7% | 2.0% | 7.9% | 3.3% |
if there is higher detection risk then we only need to put lesser work and data collection on it, in contrary case if there is lower detection risk we need to put more audit work and evidence collection on it.
on the basis of above point
case 6 require most audit work
And case 1 require least audit work
if AR is changed to 4% in case 1 answer is
Case 1 | |
IR | 25.0% |
CR | 50.0% |
AR | 4.0% |
DR | 32.0% |
in the above case detection risk become higher therefore lower the audit procedure on them, the answer is the amount of work should be decrease
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.