Question

EVER BEEN DIVORCED OR SEPARATED * BELIEF IN LIFE AFTER DEATH Crosstabulation
			BELIEF IN LIFE AFTER DEATH		Total
			YES	NO
EVER BEEN DIVORCED OR SEPARATED	YES	Count	396	82	478
		% within BELIEF IN LIFE AFTER DEATH	26.1%	24.3%	25.8%
	NO	Count	1119	256	1375
		% within BELIEF IN LIFE AFTER DEATH	73.9%	75.7%	74.2%
Total		Count	1515	338	1853
		% within BELIEF IN LIFE AFTER DEATH	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%

The description of this table is that yes 26.1% believe in life after death. As well asyes24.3%do not believe in life after death. In addition, no, 73.9% believe in life after death, and 75.7% do not believe in life after death. The interpretation of this table shows us the that the sample population are more in favor to believe that there is no life after death. Which we can conclude that the sample population doesnot believe in a ‘heaven’ or ‘hell’ scenario. The interpretation of people who believe in life after death is 82.4% average for divorced or separated, and 81.4% for not being divorced. Therefore, there is not significant correlation statistical tendency life after death beliefs between the two group the sample population.   The research (H1) is that most people believe in life after death, which could be ‘heaven’ or ‘hell’ for the afterlife. The null hypothesis is (Ho) there is no relationship between the belief life after death causing divorce or separation. The strength of the relationship is that there negative, and there is no correlation between belief in life after death and if that leads to separation or divorce. For example, the table shows that more than 73.9% do not believe in life after death, and only around 26.1% believe in life after death. The research shows that most believe in life after death. But this table shows concludes that most of the participants in the research do not believe in life after death. I thought that this was remarkably interestingthis sample population believes in no life after death. This concludes that there is no correlation in beliefs of life after death is affect if participants have been divorced or separated. What I found interesting about this information is that people in the table did not believe in life after death. The research (H1) concludes to be different from the actual table results. I found this finding remarkably interesting and informative, that the tables show the sample population to expect nothing with finally deceased. They null hypothesis (H0) was also interesting because there was no evidence that conveyed that this was a leading cause of divorce. Because the table concludes that the sample population favor not believing in life after death. I thought that this information was remarkably interesting when understanding the participants ideologies of the afterlife. As well as how the sample population did not believe in life after death or the ideologies of ‘heaven and ‘hell’. In this sample population I would use random sampling to a whole extent, and I would also like to add more participant to the sample population. I feel like this would give the results more depth and see other people ideologies about the afterlife. I feel like this change would conclude different results to an extent and would be interesting and informative to the readers understanding. I felt like the study lack depth and the sample population did not have enough people in the table to participate. For this topic, there should be there should be more participants for this controversial topic. The research going forward would be interesting to find is if different religious belief in a marriage, could it be a leading cause to divorce to divorce or separation.

Chi-Square Tests
	Value	df	Asymptotic Significance (2-sided)	Exact Sig. (2-sided)	Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square	.509a	1	.475
Continuity Correctionb	.416	1	.519
Likelihood Ratio	.515	1	.473
Fisher's Exact Test				.493	.261
Linear-by-Linear Association	.509	1	.476
N of Valid Cases	1853
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 87.19.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

The null hypothesis is fail to reject the null. I need the correct hypothesis details.

Answer 1