A physiologist wishes to compare the effects of two
concentrations of muscle relaxant on the quadriceps muscle in
long-distance male runners. After acquiring ethical clearance, the
researcher randomly selects 30 female long-distance runners (LDR)
from a national list that included all male and female registered
LDRs.
The researcher later marks a 7mm long muscle on the
thigh (the rectus femoris which occupies the
middle of the thigh) of each study participant and injects the
higher concentration (in the marked muscle area) to 15 of the
runners (randomly selected from the 30). The lower concentration is
injected in the marked muscle area of the remaining 15
participants.
The researcher later measures the length of the marked
muscle in all 30 participants after 15 minutes of the injection and
she wants to conclude whether the two concentrations of drug differ
in their effect. The estimate she will be using is
the difference in sample means.
The results were as follows: the mean muscle length
for the high concentration was 14 mm, and for the low
concentration, 9.5 mm.
The researcher knew from previous large-scale research that the value of the population standard deviation for the effect of the high concentration of the relaxant drug on muscle was: σH=0.7 mm, and the population standard deviation for the low concentration was: σL=0.6 mm.
Question: Conclude your findings. What could the
researcher conclude about the effect of the two drug concentrations
on muscle relaxation and can the researcher apply the
results on female long-distance runners? Elaborate your
answer.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.