A company has developed a new dipstick test for urinary tract infection (UTI). The test shows either “positive” or “negative” (there are no equivocal results). You wish to test this in your A&E, where, on average, 15% of your patients under 1 year of age with fever have a true UTI, as diagnosed by a positive urine culture (> 105 cfu/ml) when obtained under sterile conditions (e.g. suprapubic aspirate or catheter-obtained urine).
Over the next 6 months, you evaluate the dipstick on 100 patients less than 1 year of age presenting with fever, and obtain the following results:
N |
||
Urine Culture + |
Dipstick + |
10 |
Urine Culture + |
Dipstick - |
2 |
Urine Culture - |
Dipstick + |
11 |
Urine Culture - |
Dipstick - |
77 |
Your colleague, Dr Bayes, in a different A&E decides, on the basis of your evaluation, to adopt the dipstick test. Her A&E has a different catchment area to yours, and has an estimated UTI rate of 8% in febrile infants.
would you use the test in either A&E? What factors may help you decide?
SOLUTION:
For Dr.Bayes lab:
Now,
In my lab : P(actual+) = 0.05 ; after carrying out similar calculations,
as done above with Dr. Bayes lab, we get for my lab,
P(actual+ /dipstick+) = 0.5405
So, in my lab, this probability > Mr. Bayes lab probability.
This is justfied because in my lab there is higher prevalence i.e.
15 % of prevalence than 8% in Mr. Bayes lab.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.