Question

A local police chief claims that 61%61% of all drug-related arrests are never prosecuted. A sample...

A local police chief claims that 61%61% of all drug-related arrests are never prosecuted. A sample of 700700 arrests shows that 58%58% of the arrests were not prosecuted. Using this information, one officer wants to test the claim that the number of arrests that are never prosecuted is less than what the chief stated. Is there enough evidence at the 0.020.02 level to support the officer's claim?

Step 1 of 7 :  

State the null and alternative hypotheses.

step 2

find test stat?

step3

Find p value?

step 4

single or two tailed?

step 5

decision?

Math   Statistics-And-Probability   
0 0
Add a commentTranscribed image text
Next >

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Dear student,
I am waiting for your feedback. I have given my 100% to solve your queries. If you are satisfied by my given answer. Can you please like it☺

0 0
Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Log In

Sign Up

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
A local police chief claims that 31% of all drug-related arrests are never prosecuted. A sample...
A local police chief claims that 31% of all drug-related arrests are never prosecuted. A sample of 500 arrests shows that 27% of the arrests were not prosecuted. Using this information, one officer wants to test the claim that the number of arrests that are never prosecuted is under what the chief stated. Is there enough evidence at the 0.02 level to support the officer's claim? Step 1: Find the value of the test statistic. Round your answer to two...
A local police chief claims that 76% of all drug-related arrests are never prosecuted. A sample...
A local police chief claims that 76% of all drug-related arrests are never prosecuted. A sample of 700 arrests shows that 72% of the arrests were not prosecuted. Using this information, one officer wants to test the claim that the number of arrests that are never prosecuted is different from what the chief stated. Is there enough evidence at the 0.01level to support the officer's claim? Step 1 of 7 : State the null and alternative hypotheses. Step 2 of...
A local police chief claims that 67% of all drug-related arrests are never prosecuted. A sample...
A local police chief claims that 67% of all drug-related arrests are never prosecuted. A sample of 600 arrests shows that 64% of the arrests were not prosecuted. Using this information, one officer wants to test the claim that the number of arrests that are never prosecuted is less than what the chief stated. Is there enough evidence at the 0.05 level to support the officer's claim? State the null and alternative hypotheses. Find the value of the test statistic....
A local police chief claims that 40% of all robbery-related arrests are never prosecuted. A sample...
A local police chief claims that 40% of all robbery-related arrests are never prosecuted. A sample of 800 arrests shows that 37% of the arrests were not prosecuted. Using this information, one officer wants to test the claim that the number of arrests that are never prosecuted is different from what the chief stated. Is there enough evidence at the 0.01 level to support the officer's claim? Step 1 State the null and alternative hypotheses. Step 2 Find the value...
A local police chief claims that 68% of all robbery-related arrests are never prosecuted. A sample...
A local police chief claims that 68% of all robbery-related arrests are never prosecuted. A sample of 700 arrests shows that 65% of the arrests were not prosecuted. Using this information, one officer wants to test the claim that the number of arrests that are never prosecuted is different from what the chief stated. Is there enough evidence at the 0.10 level to support the officer's claim? Step 1 of 6: State the null and alternative hypotheses. Step 2 of...
A local police chief claims that 46% 46 % of all robbery-related arrests are never prosecuted....
A local police chief claims that 46% 46 % of all robbery-related arrests are never prosecuted. A sample of 500 arrests shows that 43 % of the arrests were not prosecuted. Using this information, one officer wants to test the claim that the number of arrests that are never prosecuted is below what the chief stated. Is there enough evidence at the 0.05 level to support the officer's claim? Step 1 of 7: State the null and alternative hypotheses. Step...
60% of all robbery-related arrests are never prosecuted. A sample of 500 arrests shows that 56%...
60% of all robbery-related arrests are never prosecuted. A sample of 500 arrests shows that 56% of the arrests were not prosecuted. Using this information, one officer wants to test the claim that the number of arrests that are never prosecuted is different from what the chief stated. Is there enough evidence at the 0.05 level to support the officer's claim? Step 1 State the null and alternative hypotheses. Step 2 Find the value of the test statistic. Round your...
A local police chief claims that about 33% of all drug related arrests are ever prosecuted....
A local police chief claims that about 33% of all drug related arrests are ever prosecuted. A sample of 900 arrests shows that 37% of the arrests were prosecuted. Is there sufficient evidence at the 0.05 level to refute the chief's claim? State the null and alternative hypotheses for the above scenario.
A pharmaceutical company claims that its new drug reduces systolic blood pressure. The systolic blood pressure...
A pharmaceutical company claims that its new drug reduces systolic blood pressure. The systolic blood pressure (in millimeters of mercury) for nine patients before taking the new drug and 22 hours after taking the drug are shown in the table below. Is there enough evidence to support the company's claim? Let d=(blood pressure before taking new drug)−(blood pressure after taking new drug). Use a significance level of α=0.01 for the test. Assume that the systolic blood pressure levels are normally...
A pharmaceutical company claims that its new drug reduces systolic blood pressure. The systolic blood pressure...
A pharmaceutical company claims that its new drug reduces systolic blood pressure. The systolic blood pressure (in millimeters of mercury) for nine patients before taking the new drug and 2 hours after taking the drug are shown in the table below. Is there enough evidence to support the company's claim? Let d=(blood pressure before taking new drug)−(blood pressure after taking new drug). Use a significance level of α=0.05 for the test. Assume that the systolic blood pressure levels are normally...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT