Question

A local police chief claims that about 33% of all drug related arrests are ever prosecuted....

A local police chief claims that about 33% of all drug related arrests are ever prosecuted. A sample of 900 arrests shows that 37% of the arrests were prosecuted. Is there sufficient evidence at the 0.05 level to refute the chief's claim? State the null and alternative hypotheses for the above scenario.

Math   Statistics-And-Probability   
0 0
Add a commentTranscribed image text
Next >

Homework Answers

Answer #1

0 0
Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Log In

Sign Up

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
A local police chief claims that 67% of all drug-related arrests are never prosecuted. A sample...
A local police chief claims that 67% of all drug-related arrests are never prosecuted. A sample of 600 arrests shows that 64% of the arrests were not prosecuted. Using this information, one officer wants to test the claim that the number of arrests that are never prosecuted is less than what the chief stated. Is there enough evidence at the 0.05 level to support the officer's claim? State the null and alternative hypotheses. Find the value of the test statistic....
A local police chief claims that 61%61% of all drug-related arrests are never prosecuted. A sample...
A local police chief claims that 61%61% of all drug-related arrests are never prosecuted. A sample of 700700 arrests shows that 58%58% of the arrests were not prosecuted. Using this information, one officer wants to test the claim that the number of arrests that are never prosecuted is less than what the chief stated. Is there enough evidence at the 0.020.02 level to support the officer's claim? Step 1 of 7 :   State the null and alternative hypotheses. step 2...
A local police chief claims that 76% of all drug-related arrests are never prosecuted. A sample...
A local police chief claims that 76% of all drug-related arrests are never prosecuted. A sample of 700 arrests shows that 72% of the arrests were not prosecuted. Using this information, one officer wants to test the claim that the number of arrests that are never prosecuted is different from what the chief stated. Is there enough evidence at the 0.01level to support the officer's claim? Step 1 of 7 : State the null and alternative hypotheses. Step 2 of...
A local police chief claims that 68% of all robbery-related arrests are never prosecuted. A sample...
A local police chief claims that 68% of all robbery-related arrests are never prosecuted. A sample of 700 arrests shows that 65% of the arrests were not prosecuted. Using this information, one officer wants to test the claim that the number of arrests that are never prosecuted is different from what the chief stated. Is there enough evidence at the 0.10 level to support the officer's claim? Step 1 of 6: State the null and alternative hypotheses. Step 2 of...
A local police chief claims that 40% of all robbery-related arrests are never prosecuted. A sample...
A local police chief claims that 40% of all robbery-related arrests are never prosecuted. A sample of 800 arrests shows that 37% of the arrests were not prosecuted. Using this information, one officer wants to test the claim that the number of arrests that are never prosecuted is different from what the chief stated. Is there enough evidence at the 0.01 level to support the officer's claim? Step 1 State the null and alternative hypotheses. Step 2 Find the value...
A local police chief claims that 46% 46 % of all robbery-related arrests are never prosecuted....
A local police chief claims that 46% 46 % of all robbery-related arrests are never prosecuted. A sample of 500 arrests shows that 43 % of the arrests were not prosecuted. Using this information, one officer wants to test the claim that the number of arrests that are never prosecuted is below what the chief stated. Is there enough evidence at the 0.05 level to support the officer's claim? Step 1 of 7: State the null and alternative hypotheses. Step...
A local police chief claims that 31% of all drug-related arrests are never prosecuted. A sample...
A local police chief claims that 31% of all drug-related arrests are never prosecuted. A sample of 500 arrests shows that 27% of the arrests were not prosecuted. Using this information, one officer wants to test the claim that the number of arrests that are never prosecuted is under what the chief stated. Is there enough evidence at the 0.02 level to support the officer's claim? Step 1: Find the value of the test statistic. Round your answer to two...
60% of all robbery-related arrests are never prosecuted. A sample of 500 arrests shows that 56%...
60% of all robbery-related arrests are never prosecuted. A sample of 500 arrests shows that 56% of the arrests were not prosecuted. Using this information, one officer wants to test the claim that the number of arrests that are never prosecuted is different from what the chief stated. Is there enough evidence at the 0.05 level to support the officer's claim? Step 1 State the null and alternative hypotheses. Step 2 Find the value of the test statistic. Round your...
A newsletter publisher believes that 30% of their readers own a Rolls Royce. Is there sufficient...
A newsletter publisher believes that 30% of their readers own a Rolls Royce. Is there sufficient evidence at the 0.05 level to refute the publisher's claim? State the null and alternative hypotheses for the above scenario.
A hospital director believes that 45% of the lab reports contain errors. A sample of 260...
A hospital director believes that 45% of the lab reports contain errors. A sample of 260 reports found 104errors. Is there sufficient evidence at the 0.10 level to refute the hospital director's claim? State the null and alternative hypotheses for the above scenario.
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT