Question

2. If you calculate an effect size of .2, what can you say about the relative...

2. If you calculate an effect size of .2, what can you say about the relative strength of the differences between the means of two populations?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Using the correlation and effect size table, we know effect size of 0.2 corresponds to 0.1 correlation coefficient, effect size of 0.5 corresponds to 0.3 correlation coefficient and effect size of 0.8 corresponds to 0.5 correlation coefficient

Therefore, we can say that the effect size of 0.2 corresponds to the weaker relative strength because the correlation coefficient corresponding to effect size of 0.2 is also very small.

Thus, effect size of 0.2 corresponds to lower or weaker relative strength

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Examine the olfactory bulbs; what observation can you make about their size relative to the size...
Examine the olfactory bulbs; what observation can you make about their size relative to the size of the brain? What might this comparison imply?
What can you say about the relation between the 2 variables if the correlation coefficient is...
What can you say about the relation between the 2 variables if the correlation coefficient is .95?
what can you say about the polydisparity of synthetic and natural polymer? Calculate the average degree...
what can you say about the polydisparity of synthetic and natural polymer? Calculate the average degree of polymerization of Nylon 11
Topic: What can you say about a sample mean or a sample proportion being about 2...
Topic: What can you say about a sample mean or a sample proportion being about 2 SEs away from the population mean or the true proportion? What can you NOT say? Discuss (4-5 sentences minimum) these questions.  
What can you say about Revenue Recognition in cases that there is a risk of not...
What can you say about Revenue Recognition in cases that there is a risk of not paying the invoices between one company which sells goods and other company which buys good and faces financial diffuculties to pay off the amount of the invoices
In general, what does an “effect size” refer to, and how is it relevant to the...
In general, what does an “effect size” refer to, and how is it relevant to the study of gender differences/similarities? How do common assumptions about gender differences match (or not match) the actual effect sizes of the studies? Understand what different numerical effect sizes tell us. What are a meta-analysis and meta-synthesis, and how are they helpful in understanding gender differences? Gender differences, and possible explanations for the differences, in each of the following: aggression, emotionality, verbal communication What is...
Part I Measures of effect size are useful because: A. They can be used with almost...
Part I Measures of effect size are useful because: A. They can be used with almost any statistical test B. Hypothesis testing only tells us if there is a statistically significant result C. They tell us how large a significant effect might be D. All of the above Part II Broadly speaking, what does a oneway ANOVA tell us? A. It gives us a range of values where the true population mean difference might be found B. It tells us...
What can you say about the ATC curve of a natural monopoly? a. It is constant....
What can you say about the ATC curve of a natural monopoly? a. It is constant. b. It is increasing. c. It is U-shaped. d. It is decreasing.
If A and B are two disjunct and independent events, what can we say about the...
If A and B are two disjunct and independent events, what can we say about the chance of A and about the chance of B?
What does the risk say about the relative importance of the PV up to H versus...
What does the risk say about the relative importance of the PV up to H versus the PV beyond H? 2011 Horizon Value $246,197.85 PV Horizon value $122,403.85 PV 2007-2010 $67,773.35 PV Company $190,177.19