Question

2. For the following enumerative argument, (1) what is the premise, (2) what is the conclusion,...

2. For the following enumerative argument,

(1) what is the premise,

(2) what is the conclusion,

(3) What is the sample,

(4) what is the target group,

(5) what is the relevant property mentioned,

(6) is the argument strong or weak? Explain why.

    A poll of cellphone users who do not have landlines showed that 55 percent of them have no objections to gay marriage. Thus, more than half the population do not object to gay marriage.

Homework Answers

Answer #1
  1. Simply speaking a premise or premises is a statement that an argument claims will induce or justify a conclusion. In other words, a premise is an assumption that something is true.
  2. A conclusion is the last part of something, its end or result.
  3. A sample is a smaller, manageable version of a larger group..A sample is small part of anything or one of a number, intended to show the quality, style, or nature of the whole; specimen
  4. Target Group is the group people that a policy or campaign is hoping to influence in some way.In Research activities, a researcher is targeting a specific group of people upon which the research will be conducted.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
1. Is this argument: deductive, inductive, or no argument. 2. What is the premise and the...
1. Is this argument: deductive, inductive, or no argument. 2. What is the premise and the conclusion? 3. Is argument valid or invalid? Strong or weak? "If someone is arrested for exercising her first amendment rights, then either she will be found innocent or she will appeal her case to the Supreme Court. Everyone who is found innocent is relieved. Since no one who is found innocent appeals her case to the Supreme Court, it follows that all people who...
3. For the following analogical argument, (1) what is the premise or premises, (2) what is...
3. For the following analogical argument, (1) what is the premise or premises, (2) what is the conclusion, (3) what is the analogy, (4) what are the properties mentioned, (5) is the argument strong or weak? Explain why.     Master Kao said, “Men’s nature is like a current of water. If you open a channel for the current to the east, it will flow east. If you open a channel to the west, it will flow west. Men’s nature makes...
What’s the sub-conclusion of the following argument? (What sentence is both a premise and a conclusion?)...
What’s the sub-conclusion of the following argument? (What sentence is both a premise and a conclusion?) Free international trade leads to vast disparities in wealth. That much is clear from the events of the last few decades and the current world distribution of wealth. Disparity in wealth is not bad in itself but it can and often does lead to global instability and violence when the have-nots perceive the distribution as unfair. Since free international trade leads to wealth disparity...
1. According to Descartes, which proposition is necessarily true? Why? 2. By what argument does Descartes...
1. According to Descartes, which proposition is necessarily true? Why? 2. By what argument does Descartes reach the conclusion that he is a mind? Do you agree? 3. What implications does Descartes draw from the example of the piece of wax? What are your thoughts on this? Why? 4. Do you agree with Descartes that you can achieve an easier understanding of your own mind than of anything else? Why?
Now consider the following argument: Since all philosophers are skeptics, it follows that no theologian is...
Now consider the following argument: Since all philosophers are skeptics, it follows that no theologian is a skeptic, since no philosophers are theologians. The argument is: Valid Invalid rule 2 is broken Invalid rule 3 is broken Flag this Question Question 174 pts Consider the following argument: Some pedestrians are not jaywalkers. Thus, some jaywalkers are not gardeners, since no gardeners are pedestrians. The argument is: Valid Invalid rule 1 is broken Invalid rule 3 is broken Flag this Question...
Which one of the following situations does NOT have a retain cycle? Object 1 of struct...
Which one of the following situations does NOT have a retain cycle? Object 1 of struct A is assigned to a member of Object 2 of struct B, while Object 2 of struct B is assigned to a member of Object 1 of struct A. Object 1 of class A is assigned to a member of Object 2 of class A, while Object 2 of class A is assigned to a member of Object 1 of class A. Object 1...
Inductive generalizations have this form:1. X percent of the observed members of group A have property...
Inductive generalizations have this form:1. X percent of the observed members of group A have property B. (the sample)2.Thus, about X percent of A have property B. (the generalization from the sample)For instance: 1. 40% of the pickles you have pulled out of the barrel are very good.2.Therefore, about 40% of the pickles in the barrel are very good.To assess the strength or weakness of inductive generalizations (arguments which generalize from sample sets), logicians run through 3 checks: CHECK #1:...
Inductive generalizations have this form:1. X percent of the observed members of group A have property...
Inductive generalizations have this form:1. X percent of the observed members of group A have property B. (the sample)2.Thus, about X percent of A have property B. (the generalization from the sample)For instance: 1. 40% of the pickles you have pulled out of the barrel are very good.2.Therefore, about 40% of the pickles in the barrel are very good.To assess the strength or weakness of inductive generalizations (arguments which generalize from sample sets), logicians run through 3 checks: CHECK #1:...
Inductive generalizations have this form:1. X percent of the observed members of group A have property...
Inductive generalizations have this form:1. X percent of the observed members of group A have property B. (the sample)2.Thus, about X percent of A have property B. (the generalization from the sample)For instance: 1. 40% of the pickles you have pulled out of the barrel are very good.2.Therefore, about 40% of the pickles in the barrel are very good.To assess the strength or weakness of inductive generalizations (arguments which generalize from sample sets), logicians run through 3 checks: CHECK #1:...
(1 point) Is college worth it? Part I Among a simple random sample of 331 American...
(1 point) Is college worth it? Part I Among a simple random sample of 331 American adults who do not have a four-year college degree and are not currently enrolled in school, 48% said they decided not to go to college because they could not afford school. A newspaper article states that only a minority of the Americans who decide not to go to college do so because they cannot afford it and uses the point estimate from this survey...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT