4. Stanley says to Chris “I will pay you $1,000.00 if you paint my office.” Chris begins painting the following Monday. Once he is finished painting, Stanley refuses to pay him any money for the job stating that he and Chris did not have a valid contract. What are the elements of a valid contract? Did the parties have one and if so, what kind was it? What remedies, if any, does Chris have to be paid?
Considering this case from a legal standpoint, we can assume that what Stanley refuses to recognize as a contract is actually enforceable due to the fact that there was an oral agreement which was made in good faith between the two parties. The requirement of a contract in actual binding is only required for some elements and an oral contract is generally considered in binding and enforceable as long as it is within reason. Chris can, therefore, seek legal help in the matter in order to be paid because he is not of fault in the matter. What he assumed to be a contract was valid since it was reasonable and both the parties agreed to it.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.