The following table indicates the aggregate quarterly invoices (in US$) between each affiliated company for a recent quarter.
Payee (thousands) |
||||||||
Payor (thousands) |
Australia |
Belgium |
Germany |
Japan |
Singapore |
UK |
US |
|
Australia |
9 |
217 |
197 |
282 |
211 |
144 |
||
Belgium |
278 |
59 |
220 |
294 |
160 |
65 |
||
Germany |
93 |
298 |
186 |
6 |
94 |
296 |
||
Japan |
125 |
153 |
220 |
272 |
294 |
216 |
||
Singapore |
15 |
190 |
240 |
9 |
238 |
95 |
||
UK |
139 |
228 |
99 |
272 |
170 |
298 |
||
US |
70 |
47 |
86 |
247 |
281 |
260 |
If the company uses a re-invoice center, there may be more payments and as a result higher transaction costs than with e.g., multi-lateral netting. Why might the company still elect to use a re-invoice center?
In an company which has international operations the re-invoicing system is used whereby the center receives and pays all invoices in the currency of the originating country and then reinvoices the product to the receiving company in the currency of the receiver's home country.
This method is employed to protect the company from risk exposure caused by currency fluctuations.
This enables the local operations of the company to supply currency to the local units thus improving short term liquidity by providing flexiblity in intra-firm payments.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.