Question

1. Why was it profitable for GM and Ford to integrate backward into component-parts manufacturing in the past, and why are both companies now buying more of their parts from outside suppliers? What value creation activities should a company outsource to independent suppliers? What are the risks involved in outsourcing these activities?3 pages

Answer 1

Why was it profitable for GM and Ford to integrate backward into component-parts manufacturing in the past, and why are both companies now buying more of their parts from outside suppliers? What value creation activities should a company outsource to independent suppliers? What are the risks involved in outsourcing these activities? 3 pages

ANSWER:

Back in the 1920s, when Ford and GM initially started to vertically coordinate in reverse, there were two fundamental explanations behind doing as such. In the first place, the segment gracefully industry was not all around grew, so automakers needed to make most parts themselves. Second, they needed to accomplish tight coordination's between phases of creation to bring down their creation costs.

By the 1980s, notwithstanding; conditions had changed. The absence of serious weight prompted inward providers to get wasteful (the bureaucratic expenses were high). Likewise, unionization made in house providers' work costs excessively high. Moreover, limit decrease implied that the two organizations were encountering an abundance limit at in house providers. Additionally, Japanese auto organizations had demonstrated that going into long haul legally binding associations with segment providers was a practical ease option in contrast to the formal vertical combination.

NOTE: PLEASE RATE MY ANSWER IT WILL HELP ME A LOT THANK YOU.