Comment on what this person did well with the
paraphrasing, and what they could have done differently. 150
words
Original paragraph:
“The accepted wisdom about the US overdose crisis singles out
prescribing as the causative vector. Although drug supply is a key
factor, we posit that the crisis is fundamentally fueled by
economic and social upheaval, its etiology closely
linked to the role of opioids as a refuge from physical and
psychological trauma, concentrated disadvantage, isolation, and
hopelessness. Overreliance on opioid medications is emblematic of a
health care system that incentivizes quick, simplistic answers to
complex physical and mental health needs. In an analogous way,
simplistic measures to cut access to opioids offer illusory
solutions to this multidimensional societal challenge” (Dasgupta,
et al. 2018).
My paraphrase:
The popular judgment concerning the opioid epidemic in the United
States, is that the physicians that prescribe drugs, are
responsible. Yes, the drugs must come from somewhere, but we
postulate that the epidemic is essentially fed by environmental
turmoil. This can be associated with ones use of opioids as a haven
from trauma, harm, loneliness, and depression. Healthcare, along
with the world in general, looks for the instantaneous fix to a
complex issue, a major one being mental health. In some ways, the
attempts to end the accessibility of opioids are a false solution
to a much larger issue (Dasgupta, et all. 2018).
compare the original article to the paraphrased article and comment on what was done well and what could have done better
Positives of given paraphrase :
Points to improvise: :
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.