Question

1. How do the Modigliani and Miller Propositions 1 and 2 change when taxes are considered?...

1. How do the Modigliani and Miller Propositions 1 and 2 change when taxes are considered? Why is there a difference?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

MM1 states WACC ( weighted average cost of capital) is independent of changes in tax . WACC doesnot change with changes in capital structure However MM2 states WACC reduces with increase in tax and increases with reduction in tax. WACC is dependent on capital structure.

This difference is there because MMI states that interest payments are not tax deductible where as MM2 states that interest payments are tax deductible.

Please Discuss in case of Doubt

Best of Luck. God Bless
Please Rate Well

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Answer the problem based on the framework of Modigliani and Miller Propositions. Assume that a company...
Answer the problem based on the framework of Modigliani and Miller Propositions. Assume that a company has earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) of $1,000,000 every year forever. The firm also has perpetual bonds with the market value of $2,000,000. The before-tax cost of debt is 8 percent. The firm’s unlevered cost of capital is 15 percent. The tax rate is 25 percent. a) Find the value of the firm. b) Find the value of equity. c) Find the firm’s...
1- Under the theory of Modigliani & Miller without taxes, which of the following statements is...
1- Under the theory of Modigliani & Miller without taxes, which of the following statements is false? a) The capital structure is irrelevant. b) The cost of equity is a linear function of the equity-to-debt ratio. c) The value of the levered company is equal to the value of the unlevered company. d) The cost of equity increases as the debt-to-equity ratio increases. 2 - Which of the following statements is true regarding the pecking order theory? a) The external...
In perfect and complete markets Miller and Modigliani (1958) show that there is no advantage to...
In perfect and complete markets Miller and Modigliani (1958) show that there is no advantage to debt vs equity in the capital structure. That is, the value of the firm is determined by its income from operations, not from its capital structure. What do Miller and Modigliani mean by perfect and complete markets? How did their argument change with the introduction of corporate taxes into their model?
The basic point being made by Modigliani and Miller is that in the absence of taxes...
The basic point being made by Modigliani and Miller is that in the absence of taxes and transaction costs 1. the optimal capital structure balances the firm’s tax-shield and financial distress costs. 2. a firm cannot change the total value of its outstanding securities by changing its capital structure 3. greater debt leads to a lower weighted-average cost of capital and greater firm value. 4. we must account for the timing and risk of cash flows in order to properly...
Which of the following statements are correct about Modigliani and Miller’s propositions with taxes? A. A...
Which of the following statements are correct about Modigliani and Miller’s propositions with taxes? A. A firm's weighted average cost of capital stays constant as the firm’s debt-equity ratio increases. B. The value of an unlevered firm is equal to the value of a levered firm plus the value of the interest tax shield. C. The capital structure of a firm does not matter for firm value because investors can create homemade leverage. D. The value of a firm increases...
In perfect and complete markets Miller and Modigliani (1958) show that there is no advantage to...
In perfect and complete markets Miller and Modigliani (1958) show that there is no advantage to debt vs equity in the capital structure.  That is, the value of the firm is determined by its income from operations, not from its capital structure. What do MM mean by perfect and complete markets? How did their argument change with the introduction of corporate taxes into their model?
Discuss Modigliani and Miller's Propositions I and II in a perfect world without taxes nor distress...
Discuss Modigliani and Miller's Propositions I and II in a perfect world without taxes nor distress costs. List the basic assumptions, results, and intuition of the model. Based on this model, if the original unlevered firm value is $100 million and the CFO is planning to carry out a leveraged recapitalization to a debt equity ratio of 1:1. What’s the levered firm value? If the unlevered equity requires 10% annual return and the debt requires a 6% of annual return,...
In a Modigliani and Miller world with no taxes, consider a firm paying £Z per share...
In a Modigliani and Miller world with no taxes, consider a firm paying £Z per share in dividends. An investor owns 100 shares and the ex-dividend share price is £100. Which one of the following is false? If the investor does not need cash and wants to keep the amount invested in shares unchanged, he simply needs to buy a number Z of additional shares. If the investor wants to have more than £100xZ in cash, he will just need...
Under Modigliani and Miller world, as the CEO of company, when you decided to distribute 1...
Under Modigliani and Miller world, as the CEO of company, when you decided to distribute 1 Billion dollar cash, one of your shareholders, Mr. A, who purchased the stock on the ex-date, raised a concern that he will not be getting any dividend and he will be adversely affected by the distribution of the cash. On the other hand, another shareholder, Mr. B, who was holding the stock before the ex-date argued that the earnings per share decreased and he...
A company is about to undertake a new project. In a Modigliani and Miller world with...
A company is about to undertake a new project. In a Modigliani and Miller world with only tax, the cash flows are given as following. 1. year 2. year 3. year 4. year 5. year 10 10 10 10 10 Risk free rate =3%, cost of debt = 6% and return on equity =15%. The CEO calculated NPV as 0. Thus, he is indifferent in terms of undertaking the project and does not know what to do. When you checked...