Question

In perfect and complete markets Miller and Modigliani (1958) show that there is no advantage to...

In perfect and complete markets Miller and Modigliani (1958) show that there is no advantage to debt vs equity in the capital structure.  That is, the value of the firm is determined by its income from operations, not from its capital structure.

What do MM mean by perfect and complete markets?

How did their argument change with the introduction of corporate taxes into their model?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

The Modigliani and Miller approach to capital theory, devised in the 1950s, advocates the capital structure irrelevancy theory. This suggests that the valuation of a firm is irrelevant to the capital structure of a company. Whether a firm is highly leveraged or has a lower debt component has no bearing on its market value. Rather, the market value of a firm is solely dependent on the operating profits of the company.

The capital structure of a company is the way a company finances its assets. A company can finance its operations by either equity or different combinations of debt and equity. The capital structure of a company can have a majority of the debt component or a majority of equity, or an even mix of both debt and equity. Each approach has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. There are various capital structure theories that attempt to establish a relationship between the financial leverage of a company (the proportion of debt in the company’s capital structure) with its market value. One such approach is the Modigliani and Miller Approach.

MODIGLIANI AND MILLER APPROACH :-

This approach was devised by Modigliani and Miller during the 1950s. The fundamentals of the Modigliani and Miller Approach resemble that of the Net Operating Income Approach. Modigliani and Miller advocate capital structure irrelevancy theory, which suggests that the valuation of a firm is irrelevant to the capital structure of a company. Whether a firm is highly leveraged or has a lower debt component in the financing mix has no bearing on the value of a firm.

The Modigliani and Miller Approach further states that the market value of a firm is affected by its operating income, apart from the risk involved in the investment. The theory stated that the value of the firm is not dependent on the choice of capital structure or financing decisions of the firm.

ASSUMPTIONS OF MODIGLIANI AND MILLER APPROACH :- 1. There are no taxes.

2. Transaction cost for buying and selling securities, as well as the bankruptcy cost, is nil.

3. There is a symmetry of information. This means that an investor will have access to the same information that a corporation would and investors will thus behave rationally.

4. The cost of borrowing is the same for investors and companies.

5. There is no floatation cost, such as an underwriting commission, payment to merchant bankers, advertisement expenses, etc.

6. There is no corporate dividend tax.

The Modigliani and Miller Approach indicates that the value of a leveraged firm (a firm that has a mix of debt and equity) is the same as the value of an unleveraged firm (a firm that is wholly financed by equity) if the operating profits and future prospects are same. That is, if an investor purchases shares of a leveraged firm, it would cost him the same as buying the shares of an unleveraged firm.

MODIGLIANI AND MILLER APPROACH - PROPOSITIONS WITH TAXES :-

The Modigliani and Miller Approach assumes that there are no taxes, but in the real world, this is far from the truth. Most countries, if not all, tax companies. This theory recognizes the tax benefits accrued by interest payments. The interest paid on borrowed funds is tax deductible. However, the same is not the case with dividends paid on equity. In other words, the actual cost of debt is less than the nominal cost of debt due to tax benefits. The trade-off theory advocates that a company can capitalize its requirements with debts as long as the cost of distress, i.e., the cost of bankruptcy, exceeds the value of the tax benefits. Thus, the increased debts, until a given threshold value, will add value to a company.

This approach with corporate taxes does acknowledge tax savings and thus infers that a change in the debt-equity ratio has an effect on the WACC (Weighted Average Cost of Capital). This means that the higher the debt, the lower the WACC. The Modigliani and Miller approach is one of the modern approaches of Capital Structure Theory.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
In perfect and complete markets Miller and Modigliani (1958) show that there is no advantage to...
In perfect and complete markets Miller and Modigliani (1958) show that there is no advantage to debt vs equity in the capital structure. That is, the value of the firm is determined by its income from operations, not from its capital structure. What do Miller and Modigliani mean by perfect and complete markets? How did their argument change with the introduction of corporate taxes into their model?
Assume that Modigliani and Miller’s perfect capital markets assumptions hold and there are no corporate taxes....
Assume that Modigliani and Miller’s perfect capital markets assumptions hold and there are no corporate taxes. A company’s cost of debt is 10%, its cost of equity is 25% and its debt-to-equity ratio is 25%. How would the cost of equity change if the company’s debt-to-equity ratio rises to 50%? Show your calculations.
Assume that Modigliani and Miller’s perfect capital markets assumptions hold and there are no corporate taxes....
Assume that Modigliani and Miller’s perfect capital markets assumptions hold and there are no corporate taxes. A company’s cost of debt is 10%, its cost of equity is 25% and its debt-to-equity ratio is 25% Assume that the riskfree rate is 10% and the market risk premium is 7.5%. How has the company’s equity beta changed with the debt-to-equity ratio changing from 25% to 50%? Show your calculations.
Which of the following statement is true regarding the Modigliani and Miller (M&M) propositions (1958) in...
Which of the following statement is true regarding the Modigliani and Miller (M&M) propositions (1958) in a perfect financial market? A) Capital structure is irrelevant because of the assumption that investors and companies have differing tax rates. B) It is assumed that the firm’s future cash flows remain fixed under any circumstances. C) The basic lesson of M&M propositions is that company’s capital budgeting decisions are dependent upon the company's capital structure decision. D) The debt-to-equity ratio is an important...
Which of the following statements is FALSE? A. Franco Modigliani and Merton Miller argued that with...
Which of the following statements is FALSE? A. Franco Modigliani and Merton Miller argued that with perfect capital markets, the total value of a firm should not depend on its capital structure. B. Because the cash flows of the debt and equity sum to the cash flows of the project, by the Law of One Price the combined values of debt and equity must be equal to the cash flows of the project. C. Leverage decreases the risk of the...
According to Modigliani and Miller (MM), in a world without taxes, the optimal capital structure for...
According to Modigliani and Miller (MM), in a world without taxes, the optimal capital structure for a for-profit business calls for approximately 100 percent debt financing. True False
1- Under the theory of Modigliani & Miller without taxes, which of the following statements is...
1- Under the theory of Modigliani & Miller without taxes, which of the following statements is false? a) The capital structure is irrelevant. b) The cost of equity is a linear function of the equity-to-debt ratio. c) The value of the levered company is equal to the value of the unlevered company. d) The cost of equity increases as the debt-to-equity ratio increases. 2 - Which of the following statements is true regarding the pecking order theory? a) The external...
The basic point being made by Modigliani and Miller is that in the absence of taxes...
The basic point being made by Modigliani and Miller is that in the absence of taxes and transaction costs 1. the optimal capital structure balances the firm’s tax-shield and financial distress costs. 2. a firm cannot change the total value of its outstanding securities by changing its capital structure 3. greater debt leads to a lower weighted-average cost of capital and greater firm value. 4. we must account for the timing and risk of cash flows in order to properly...
______     3.      If markets are perfect (and using the other assumptions in Miller and Modigliani (1961)),...
______     3.      If markets are perfect (and using the other assumptions in Miller and Modigliani (1961)), stock prices should fall by the amount of a cash dividend. If so, can a firm make its stockholders wealthier by changing (i.e., increasing or decreasing) its dividend? A. No, under these assumptions, a firm cannot make its stockholders wealthier by changing its dividend. B. Yes, under these assumptions, a firm can make its stockholders wealthier, but only by increasing its dividend. C. Yes,...
According to the Modigliani-Miller theorem, a firm’s value is independent of its capital structure assuming no...
According to the Modigliani-Miller theorem, a firm’s value is independent of its capital structure assuming no taxes or bankruptcy costs. Describe how changing these assumptions (i.e., assume a firm faces taxes with and without bankruptcy costs) influences its choice of capital structure and provide examples of bankruptcy costs.